Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
No. Let the kids play. Kids today are kept too busy with structured "activities" as it is.
![]()
Today's children aren't kept busy enough nor are they challenged. The public school curriculum has to teach to the lowest common denominator, aka the dumbest student in the classroom. Students aren't being challenged enough nor are they kept busy enough in school.
Their parents enrole them in a crapload of programs. I'm talking about upper middle class kids in the suburbs.
I think he is talking about high school kidsOriginally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
No. Let the kids play. Kids today are kept too busy with structured "activities" as it is.
![]()
Today's children aren't kept busy enough nor are they challenged. The public school curriculum has to teach to the lowest common denominator, aka the dumbest student in the classroom. Students aren't being challenged enough nor are they kept busy enough in school.
Their parents enrole them in a crapload of programs. I'm talking about upper middle class kids in the suburbs.
I am speaking about grade school through high school, not colleges, universities, or other higher learning institutions. Students at those facilities should be smart enough to make their own decisions and plan their own educational future.
In grade schools, parents don't enroll their children in anything, unless its an extracurricular activity. The class schedule is set by the school. In high school there is some variation in the classes, students and parents can plan the electives to maximize a potential career.
Note that I am advocating a year round schedule with regular break periods, not steadily year round.
Granted, you work year round, but many employers offer vacation time and the like. You can't just take 2 weeks off in the middle of grade school and go on a family vacation and not pay it back later.
I turned out fine and I had the regular two months in high school.Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
No. Let the kids play. Kids today are kept too busy with structured "activities" as it is.
![]()
Today's children aren't kept busy enough nor are they challenged. The public school curriculum has to teach to the lowest common denominator, aka the dumbest student in the classroom. Students aren't being challenged enough nor are they kept busy enough in school.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Year round, no. You do need some time off to let your batteries recharge, so to speak. 9 weeks on, 2 weeks off, year round would be effective, or some variation of that.
Originally posted by: hdeck
no, my school experimented with it one year and it was awful from what i remember.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
No. Let the kids play. Kids today are kept too busy with structured "activities" as it is.
![]()
Today's children aren't kept busy enough nor are they challenged. The public school curriculum has to teach to the lowest common denominator, aka the dumbest student in the classroom. Students aren't being challenged enough nor are they kept busy enough in school.
Originally posted by: TallBill
Yes, the rest of the world works year round. Especially for college, it is pathetic to take a 3 month break.
IIRC, the amount of time that they get off is about the same, it's just that it's spread throughout the year instead of lumped together.Originally posted by: ChaoZ
With the same logic, full time workers should be denied any paid vacation time. My heart aches just thinking of having to go to school that much.