• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

POll: Did you circumcise your son, if he was born in the past 5 years?

I'd have to do some research into it. If the chance of complications is low without circumcision these days I would leave him intact. I think it was originally people's bad personal cleanliness and the resulting infections that caused circumcision to become mainstream in the first place, right? If it's not necessary in an age of daily bathing then why do it?
 
I had a son on 12/30 and saw absolutely no need to circumcise my son. What reason would there be to put him through that kind of pain? If he wants it done later, I will let it be his choice.
 
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

Mutilation or maiming is an act or physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, usually without causing death.
Click to expand...
Well, it's an upgrade to the appearance, and does not significantly degrade function, so I don't think it qualifies as mutilation.
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

:roll:

I've lived through both ways. I way prefer circumcised.
Click to expand...

That's great, I have no problem with circumcision. I have a problem with mutilating innocent children without giving them a choice.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

Mutilation or maiming is an act or physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, usually without causing death.
Click to expand...
Well, it's an upgrade to the appearance, and does not significantly degrade function, so I don't think it qualifies as mutilation.
Click to expand...

Haha, godless astronomer has an ugly penis!


😉
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

:roll:

I've lived through both ways. I way prefer circumcised.
Click to expand...

Me too. I was uncircumcised until my mid teens. I prefer it circumcised. I like the way it looks and I always felt squeamish pulling the foreskin up to clean.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

Mutilation or maiming is an act or physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, usually without causing death.
Click to expand...
Well, it's an upgrade to the appearance, and does not significantly degrade function, so I don't think it qualifies as mutilation.
Click to expand...

tr.v., -lat·ed, -lat·ing, -lates.
To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See synonyms at batter1.
To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.
 
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

:roll:

I've lived through both ways. I way prefer circumcised.
Click to expand...
wat
Click to expand...

Circumcised later in life?

Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

Mutilation or maiming is an act or physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, usually without causing death.
Click to expand...
Well, it's an upgrade to the appearance, and does not significantly degrade function, so I don't think it qualifies as mutilation.
Click to expand...

Upgrade in appearance is a matter of opinion. Effect on function is up for debate. Many claim that it does harm by reducing sensitivity.

I don't really see any reason to perform it, but Godless's original post is blatant trolling.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
I see mutilation of innocent babies is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

Mutilation or maiming is an act or physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, usually without causing death.
Click to expand...
Well, it's an upgrade to the appearance, and does not significantly degrade function, so I don't think it qualifies as mutilation.
Click to expand...

Says who?
 
Why would you not circumcise in this day and age? If you do not, you are just begging for your child to feel self conscious about it during his teenage years. Why not save him the hassle?
 
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Upgrade in appearance is a matter of opinion. Effect on function is up for debate. Many claim that it does harm by reducing sensitivity.

I don't really see any reason to perform it, but Godless's original post is blatant trolling.
Click to expand...

How am I trolling? I'm not allowed to express my opinion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top