- Apr 9, 2013
- 4,470
- 0
- 0
Obviously you don't.
The boorish, ignorant premise that MOST who choose not to go SSD are "cheapskates,' for me, THE COUP DE GRAS.
All the windows.... crazy glued/epoxied shut and the glass replaced by concrete.
NECROTIC.
Obviously you don't.
I don't have an 8 core CPU either as I said, I don't buy the latest and greatest. I'm always a couple years behind it seems. Cheapskate, stingy, frugal, call it whatever you want...Can't change it.
500GB SSD + 3TB Harddrive
If you could get two 2TB SSDs affordably, would you go all solid state?
True that, pure SSD carries with it power savings as well for lappies. I just... when I have more bays and room to play and configure I cannot let it beNot only do I get that, it is one reason I have, until now, stuck with my spinners. But I also keep thinking, well, how bout those who have only lappys? And upgrade to an SSD as their only drive?
The must exist, right?
For me, having to worry about a drive's inherent limitations.....is stressful. I never had to with my spinners.
Final offering for exdeath;
This is a hardly cutting edge, bought used (but carefully chosen in every way) Optiplex 970. Not Sandy, not Ivy, forget Haswell: i7 870. 8 GBs of DDR 3; running W7 64-bit.
Two mechanical drives. Including this WD Black.
![]()
And, if I am even more meticulous, boot time is even faster. No delays opening apps, running anything.
Finis.
Just because some people buy Ferraris, doesn't mean that everyone automatically should. Especial if they only drive to the corner store to get milk. Ferraris haven't made Honda Civics obsolete, nor will SSDs make HDDs obsolete.Yes. Yes they are.
CPU:RAM speeds are over 50 GB/sec Even internet speeds are hitting 100+ MB/sec in some places.
Even my crappy CPU bottlenecked web browsing laptop has a Chronos Deluxe 240GB that almost saturates the SATA 2 link even with randoms. It's a life altering experience when the speed that you can zip 16 GB of data is limited by your CPU running 100% instead of disk access time.
Sure. There would be no reason not to go all SSD if the pricing is close to standard harddrives, but since it's not the case I'll stick with this setup.
You mean, like my E1-2500 AIO PC I recently picked up? It has a 5400RPM HDD, and I'm not even going to bother putting in an SSD. Why? Because Malwarebytes 2.x scans take 99% CPU, and only 10% disk. And that's the most stressful thing I run on that box.
Besides, after SSDs wear, they get slower. The 30GB on in my HTPC does about 30MB/sec sequential now.
You think 32 seconds is fast, that's cute.
Good read for the OP..
MLC, eMLC, SLC, TLC what they are & what they're good for.
http://www.computerweekly.com/podca...LC-TLC-what-they-are-and-what-theyre-good-for
That article wasn't about TRIM, and moreover, I don't think there is ANY reason to defrag a modern SSD.
TRIM works VERY well, and when implemented correctly, prevents the kind of longterm performance slowdown that the article describes. Moreover, performance consistency after being totally filled is a standard SSD review metric, so no longterm surprises.
Moreover, those tweaks are a mixed bag. Unless you enjoy abusing the living daylights out of your SSDs by benchmarking them multiple times a day, disabling the pagefile doesn't make a lot of sense. In normal usage (read: literally anything except for repeated benchmarking or running a database server) you will not generate the kinds of writes from pagefile use that will lower your SSDs lifetime measurably.
I would certainly make sure I was in AHCI vs. IDE mode, and it wouldn't hurt to verify TRIM was working properly.
You don't need to implement TRIM correctly, the OS takes care of that.
Edit: Posted too quickly, the 2nd article you posted gives a method for verifying that TRIM is working, if that makes you feel better I'd certainly do that, but for ordinary use, TRIM is something the OS takes care of in the background.
