I Infos Diamond Member Jul 20, 2001 4,001 1 0 Jan 7, 2002 #1 Good Article Feelings usually are intense on this one
J jjones Lifer Oct 9, 2001 15,424 2 0 Jan 7, 2002 #2 frames are mostly unnecessary; i design with only very occasional use of frames.
O Option1 Member Jan 1, 2002 94 0 0 Jan 7, 2002 #5 << frames are mostly unnecessary; i design with only very occasional use of frames. >> What jjones said! Neil
<< frames are mostly unnecessary; i design with only very occasional use of frames. >> What jjones said! Neil
G gopunk Lifer Jul 7, 2001 29,239 2 0 Jan 8, 2002 #8 it's not even a matter of keeping it simple. they just plain suck in most cases.
B bjb86s Senior member Aug 8, 2001 494 0 0 Jan 8, 2002 #9 Usually the most functional sites are tables and dynamic script (CGI, PHP, Mysql, java, etc.) I've yet to see frames done in a tasteful way.
Usually the most functional sites are tables and dynamic script (CGI, PHP, Mysql, java, etc.) I've yet to see frames done in a tasteful way.
Keego Diamond Member Aug 15, 2000 6,223 2 81 Jan 8, 2002 #10 saves me html size with my layout. I might get into ASP or whatever combines 2 pages into 1 serverside but I'm kinda too lazy to find out how to do that.
saves me html size with my layout. I might get into ASP or whatever combines 2 pages into 1 serverside but I'm kinda too lazy to find out how to do that.
V VirusDub Golden Member Aug 29, 2001 1,111 0 0 Jan 8, 2002 #11 I used frames on a page once, and it ended up sucking hard. Frames are mostly unnecessary, except in very few circumstances.
I used frames on a page once, and it ended up sucking hard. Frames are mostly unnecessary, except in very few circumstances.