Originally posted by: hdeck
they both suck. it's like choosing between aids and cancer.
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Stones by far
😕Originally posted by: mpitts
The Beatles by a mile.
The Stones are good, but the Beatles affect on music is still being felt today.
My name is Mahir. I kill you, I kill you, I kill you!Originally posted by: hdeck
they both suck. it's like choosing between aids and cancer.
Originally posted by: mpitts
The Beatles by a mile.
The Stones are good, but the Beatles affect on music is still being felt today.
I think that it gives the Stones a better percentage of great songs in the life-time output category.badmouse, I'm not understandng what you're trying to say. Are you saying that Beatles + Beatles solo works makes the Stones look much better?
Originally posted by: kalster
both were average at best