Poll: Armageddon or Deep Impact?

Locutus of Board

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 1999
7,187
0
0
My take:

Armageddon: More glitz, exciting. Not as scientifically accurate.

Deep Impact: More boring, but more scientifically accurate.

Which did you like better?
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Deep Impact. Tea Leoni's a hottie, & the plot is a lot better than Armageddon.

Armageddon was only good for Liv Tyler.

Viper GTS
 

Bryan

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,070
5
86
Armageddon. Those with the Criterion DVD, did you see Billy Bob in the outtake reel? Hilarious! :D
 

snow patrol

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2000
8,377
0
76
We had this poll a few months ago didn't we? Any way, Deep Impact was the biggest load of bollocks I've had the mis-fortune to see in a long long time. Extremely dull film.

Armageddon was so-so, but by no means exceptional.

Having said that, neither are as terrible as lost in space...

btw, Liv Tyler is a moose. :p
 

Locutus of Board

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 1999
7,187
0
0
Hey SP,


<< a few months ago >>


Yes, I think I remember it. (Search? Nyahhhhh.)

I just watched both recently.

I voted now for deep impact. I saw both in the movies and I would have voted Armageddon first.

The second viewing changed my mind. I like the scientific accuracy.

 

Russ

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
21,093
3
0
LOB,

The spoof link in your sig would be more effective without the popup.

Russ, NCNE
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
Uh, well...I actually really liked Deep Impact. The only redeeming quality about Armageddon is the scene when Willis is smacking golf balls at the green peace boat.
 

dennilfloss

Past Lifer 1957-2014 In Memoriam
Oct 21, 1999
30,509
12
0
dennilfloss.blogspot.com
Definitely Deep Impact for me. Armaggeddon has Bruce Willis (why couldn't it be Pam Tillis instead?) in it, so I won't watch it.

I hated his demeanor in Moonlighting. I still hate him now.

In The Morning Light (Yanni)