POLL: Are atheists more likely to commit crime?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
I don't think they're anymore likely than anyone else.

<--- Atheist whose worst crime has been speeding.

So the only reason you don't go off and murder and rob is because you fear a god? What about respecting and maintaining the respect of your fellow man? What about acting in a civilized fashion? Hell, what about the cops? I hope this isn't the case.
 

Legend

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2005
2,254
1
0
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,993
2,680
126
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
There is a negative correlation between level of education and committing of crime.
There is a negative correlation between level of education and belief in god.

Make of that what you will.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

Yeah, we learned all about that at atheist camp last summer and it was reenforced by the atheist preacher last Sunday. :roll:

Atheism is the absence of religion. It doesn't teach anything at all. A religionist devotes a percentage of their thoughts, time, emotion, etc. to their religion. An atheist does not. Simple.
 

Legend

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2005
2,254
1
0
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

You're sounding like a self-righteous fundamentalist...

Not all religions teach the same things, and some of those morals are subjective. That would be like saying that all atheists strongly believe in philosophy, and are more moral.

Your point of China shows exactly what I'm talking about. There's no correlation. Some religious people are moral, others are not. Some atheists are moral, others are not.

 

Mo0o

Lifer
Jul 31, 2001
24,227
3
76
Originally posted by: BD2003
There is a negative correlation between level of education and committing of crime.
There is a negative correlation between level of education and belief in god.

Make of that what you will.
No education makes you poor, being poor makes you A) commit crime B) seek comfort in something spiritual outside of your poor life, and rely on the possibility of a better life after death.

probably why religions was so popular in the middle ages
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,993
2,680
126
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

Yeah, we learned all about that at atheist camp last summer and it was reenforced by the atheist preacher last Sunday. :roll:

Atheism is the absence of religion. It doesn't teach anything at all. A religionist devotes a percentage of their thoughts, time, emotion, etc. to their religion. An atheist does not. Simple.


So we agree. But Ive never heard the term "religionist" before. And because an atheist does not receive moral instruction by default, doesnt that leave them susceptable to immoral behavior?
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

Yeah, we learned all about that at atheist camp last summer and it was reenforced by the atheist preacher last Sunday. :roll:

Atheism is the absence of religion. It doesn't teach anything at all. A religionist devotes a percentage of their thoughts, time, emotion, etc. to their religion. An atheist does not. Simple.


So we agree. But Ive never heard the term "religionist" before. And because an atheist does not receive moral instruction by default, doesnt that leave them susceptable to immoral behavior?

Of course, because morality is only taught by going to church.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: BD2003
There is a negative correlation between level of education and committing of crime.
There is a negative correlation between level of education and belief in god.

Make of that what you will.
No education makes you poor, being poor makes you A) commit crime B) seek comfort in something spiritual outside of your poor life, and rely on the possibility of a better life after death.

probably why religions was so popular in the middle ages

Also, they were a way of keeping the masses loyal to their king, with their king being divinely appointed and what not.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,993
2,680
126
Originally posted by: Legend
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

You're sounding like a self-righteous fundamentalist...

Not all religions teach the same things, and some of those morals are subjective. That would be like saying that all atheists strongly believe in philosophy, and are more moral.

Your point of China shows exactly what I'm talking about. There's no correlation. Some religious people are moral, others are not. Some atheists are moral, others are not.

Youre repeating what I already said. Both types exist for believers and non believers. China is atheist and suppresses religion.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

Yeah, we learned all about that at atheist camp last summer and it was reenforced by the atheist preacher last Sunday. :roll:

Atheism is the absence of religion. It doesn't teach anything at all. A religionist devotes a percentage of their thoughts, time, emotion, etc. to their religion. An atheist does not. Simple.


So we agree. But Ive never heard the term "religionist" before. And because an atheist does not receive moral instruction by default, doesnt that leave them susceptable to immoral behavior?

Religionist = follower of religion. Kind of like when conservative talk show commentators refer to Islamists.

One doesn't need church to receive moral instruction. A loving parent leading by example is a very affective moral teacher.
 

dmw16

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2000
7,608
0
0
I read a study once that showed a connection between religion and violent crimes in western civilizations. It found that devloped nations with a higher rate of belief in god had a higher rate of violent crimes.
 

iversonyin

Diamond Member
Aug 12, 2004
3,303
0
76
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Legend
Religion and morals are not related. You've got the moral ones, and then you've got the abortion bombing ones. Or just look at the Middle East.

Relegion teaches you morals, so it is related. Atheism teaches you nothing, except that if you dont get caught its ok (assuming you didnt have a moral belief to do otherwise). So an atheist could bomb a clinic or a church.

And yes, look at the Middle East, especially the far east like China, where religion is supressed by the government and they kill anyone at will for any reason whatsoever.

You're sounding like a self-righteous fundamentalist...

Not all religions teach the same things, and some of those morals are subjective. That would be like saying that all atheists strongly believe in philosophy, and are more moral.

Your point of China shows exactly what I'm talking about. There's no correlation. Some religious people are moral, others are not. Some atheists are moral, others are not.

Youre repeating what I already said. Both types exist for believers and non believers. China is atheist and suppresses religion.


So there crimes in China because of there is no religion or because the GDP per capita is so low that many people couldn't afford to live?

Is that 0 crime rate in a community full of those who followed religion? Last time I check God doesn't give you a mind free of sinful thought.....

Whatever OP.....spread your B/S in P&N not here
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,993
2,680
126
Originally posted by: iversonyin
So there crimes in China because of there is no religion or because the GDP per capita is so low that many people couldn't afford to live?

Is that 0 crime rate in a community full of those who followed religion? Last time I check God doesn't give you a mind free of sinful thought.....

Whatever OP.....spread your B/S in P&N not here

You extrapolated an incorrect interpretation of my statement. But please, you digress...answer the question.

Does atheism play a role in criminal behaviour?
 

Kalvin00

Lifer
Jan 11, 2003
12,705
5
81
no.

we got all these mexicans running around in their gangs, wearing their sweatshirts with ****** jesus on them. doesnt look like its doing much good there
 

imported_hscorpio

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2004
1,617
0
0
Originally posted by: BD2003
There is a negative correlation between level of education and committing of crime.
There is a negative correlation between level of education and belief in god.

Make of that what you will.

/thread

 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,993
2,680
126
Originally posted by: JackBurton
OP, it's obvious to me you need a magical babysitter to keep you in line.

Is she an atheist? No thanks. She probably thinks she can put her hand in the cookie jar while no one is looking and get away with it. However, if she was raised with values and even knew that "thou shall not steal" was a commandment, bring her on. :)
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: JackBurton
OP, it's obvious to me you need a magical babysitter to keep you in line.

Is she an atheist? No thanks. She probably thinks she can put her hand in the cookie jar while no one is looking and get away with it. However, if she was raised with values and even knew that "thou shall not steal" was a commandment, bring her on. :)
OH, so that is how you know what is right and wrong. You need to have it written down in your story book. Well can you add "thou shall not have sex with kids" as the 11th Commandment then? Because some religious people don't know that's wrong yet. That would really help out. Thanks.