<< I can see your point there, and even if I don't fully agree with it, it is a valid one. Personally, I agree with the death penalty for treason. I think that an act of treason is an act against humanity. It can put millions of lives at stake. Also, firm punishment acts a a detourer to others. If you knew that you would be killed if you slapped someone, would you slap someone? I don't think so. >>
Yes, we all know how wonderful the death penalty works as a deterrent </sarcasm>
I'm convinced that nothing, not even the threat of being put to death will keep certain people from commiting certain crimes, like murder and treason. History tells me that I'm right.
Ah, and as an aside, how about the +/- 5 people who are executed in the US each year, yet are later found to be innocent?
So, my two major gripes with the US 'Justice' system come down to this:
- fix the damn system. Right now it's an embarrassment to any country which calls 'freedom' its 'trademark'.
- the death penalty is barbaric and totally ineffective as a deterrent.
<< I guess if Walker was to admit his wrong, provide substantial evidence against al-queda and bin laden (and I'm talking MAJOR, DEFINITE evidence that leads to the direct aprehension of UBL) then I could see having another, less severe punishment. But until then, he is, and will forever be, a traitor.
Further, who is to say what this radical will do if he is let go. Maybe he will form an underground american taliban or al-queda. Who's to say, but why risk it? >>
So, just to be safe, you propose to execute people?
I guess Saddam Hussein and Stalin would have wholeheartedly agreed with you.