AstroManLuca
Lifer
For a little while, but people will just find another file sharing method.Originally posted by: Rubycon
If they block bit torrent on a global scale most of these problems will go away.
Originally posted by: JujuFish
Originally posted by: Hacp
Remember when Bill Gates said we wouldn't need more than 512kb of ram?
No, because it never happened.
And before anyone else posts it, he didn't say that about 640kb of RAM either.
Originally posted by: Hacp
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
Originally posted by: Crono
Problem is, internet access, particularly broadband, is becoming more like a utility that people feel (whether rightly or not, I don't know) they have a right to. You know, like those old NetZero commercials (before those bastards starting charging)... except with paying nominal fee for access. No one wants ISPs to charge too much for access, especially when we aren't getting the same level of speed and service that other countries (like Japan, for various reasons) get for cheap.
I know some people here think that but I see a lot more people who are fine with caps as long as they're reasonable. A 250 GB/mo cap is reasonable as it will stop only egregious BitTorrent uploaders but it is unlikely to interfere with anyone else.
People will accept reasonable caps, not unreasonable ones. Especially when TWC has a monopoly, preventing people from switching to a more realistic ISP. For many people, cable is the only high speed access available - while I'm lucky to be in an area with fast 7 Mbit DSL, many DSL users are limited to just 1.5 Mbps, which is more like 800-1000 kbps in practice and feels noticeably slower.
Once we get to HD content on the web, its not going to be enough. VOIP+Streaming TV+Regular browsing(lolflash) is going to destroy 250GB. All legal. No torrents.
Agreed. 250 GB/mo is fine for the time being but I really hope ISPs will raise their caps steadily over time. Given how fucking tight these companies are, though, I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't budge on caps for years.