- Dec 7, 2009
- 10,137
- 382
- 126
Here's a bit of political science for you:
I wonder if anyone would like to argue that the national debt doesn't matter and that it's of no significance to the future of the U.S. economy.
I mean if you had credit card debt, and you went to see a financial advisor, they'd most likely tell you to use your income to pay down the debt before investing your money elsewhere.
So is national economics different than personal economics?
Found it here: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Richard_Feynman"There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers."
I wonder if anyone would like to argue that the national debt doesn't matter and that it's of no significance to the future of the U.S. economy.
I mean if you had credit card debt, and you went to see a financial advisor, they'd most likely tell you to use your income to pay down the debt before investing your money elsewhere.
So is national economics different than personal economics?
Last edited: