Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
So what exactly would need to "happen" for you to not accept the results?
I tried to answer your question, but in all fairness we would need a crystal ball to predict what MIGHT happen and, accordingly, whether or not we would accept the results. I also take exception to the way the question is phrased - what exactly does it mean to "accept the results" anyway? I firmly believe that absent a number of discrete acts of partisanism and jury-rigging in Florida in 2000, Al Gore would have been President, and God knows I would have preferred that, but I still "accept the results," and that Bush was in fact elected President.
I know, your reply was just fine. I posed the question to the people who posted with little to no thought. I'd like to know what would trigger a change in their minds.