But think this, just for a second:
AMD demoed Polaris 10, and showed Polarid 11 silicon on CES. Nvidia didnt show anything Pascal related until now. BUT, somehow, some genius here thinks that 16nmFF+ (the node Nvidia will be using for Pascal) is yielding a lot better than 14nm LPP (the node for Polaris as evidenced by the official claim made by amd about polaris 10, and the official claim samsung made about polaris11/greenland) .
How is this possible to go against all evidence and keep regurgitating the same crap? Jesus. Just. Stop. In the CPU forums I see a post where you advised a user to stop misleading people with false information. What do you think you are doing here with your FUD/BS thread? Even the PR guy from AMD took you for a walk and you didnt notice his choice of words. You are beyond help.
AMD demoed Polaris 10, and showed Polarid 11 silicon on CES. Nvidia didnt show anything Pascal related until now. BUT, somehow, some genius here thinks that 16nmFF+ (the node Nvidia will be using for Pascal) is yielding a lot better than 14nm LPP (the node for Polaris as evidenced by the official claim made by amd about polaris 10, and the official claim samsung made about polaris11/greenland) .
How is this possible to go against all evidence and keep regurgitating the same crap? Jesus. Just. Stop. In the CPU forums I see a post where you advised a user to stop misleading people with false information. What do you think you are doing here with your FUD/BS thread? Even the PR guy from AMD took you for a walk and you didnt notice his choice of words. You are beyond help.
Facebook
Twitter