- Mar 19, 2003
- 18,289
- 2
- 71
Hi all; I've recently bought a NEC FP2141SB-BK 22" CRT - as far as I can tell, basically the best CRT monitor under $1000. However, I've noticed that it is not nearly as clear and sharp as I was expecting. It's decent (but not great) at 1600x1200 @ 85Hz, and as I move the refresh rate up to 100Hz and 109Hz, it seems to get more blurry, for lack of a better description.
I actually already have a replacement from Dell here, because I just assumed it was a bad monitor. However, I've been thinking of the possibility of the video card having something to do with it as well - since the problem seems to get worse as I near the limits of the monitor. My previous monitor was a 17" Samsung 753DF, and I never once had problems running my usual 1024x768 @ 85Hz, which I'd been using for over a year now (also on the 9700 Pro I had before).
I've not yet been able to test the replacement monitor (shuffling around two 22" 65lb monitors in a small bedroom isn't easy, to say the least), but I'm just wondering if anyone has had similar experiences with the 2D output of this card (or any 6800/GT/Ultra, I suppose) at the upper limits of the output signal resolution and refresh rate.
I've still yet to test the other output of my video card (my DVI->VGA adapter is 175 miles away right now), and I haven't tried the monitor on my old 9700 Pro either, but it seems that card only supports up to 85Hz at 1600x1200 anyway. I'm considering upgrading to an Athlon 64/PCI-Express system in the near future, so if there's a (fast) card that has better 2D output at high resolutions, I'd definitely be willing to consider it. I do remember reading that ATI was traditionally better than Nvidia in that way, but I'd assumed that only applied to the cards from several years ago...
If anyone has any input, especially with regard to this video card and/or monitor (or similar ones), it would be greatly appreciated.
I actually already have a replacement from Dell here, because I just assumed it was a bad monitor. However, I've been thinking of the possibility of the video card having something to do with it as well - since the problem seems to get worse as I near the limits of the monitor. My previous monitor was a 17" Samsung 753DF, and I never once had problems running my usual 1024x768 @ 85Hz, which I'd been using for over a year now (also on the 9700 Pro I had before).
I've not yet been able to test the replacement monitor (shuffling around two 22" 65lb monitors in a small bedroom isn't easy, to say the least), but I'm just wondering if anyone has had similar experiences with the 2D output of this card (or any 6800/GT/Ultra, I suppose) at the upper limits of the output signal resolution and refresh rate.
I've still yet to test the other output of my video card (my DVI->VGA adapter is 175 miles away right now), and I haven't tried the monitor on my old 9700 Pro either, but it seems that card only supports up to 85Hz at 1600x1200 anyway. I'm considering upgrading to an Athlon 64/PCI-Express system in the near future, so if there's a (fast) card that has better 2D output at high resolutions, I'd definitely be willing to consider it. I do remember reading that ATI was traditionally better than Nvidia in that way, but I'd assumed that only applied to the cards from several years ago...
If anyone has any input, especially with regard to this video card and/or monitor (or similar ones), it would be greatly appreciated.
