Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: daniel49
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: daniel49
For some reason this story has a Ross Perot ring to it.:frown:
That's not a Ross Perot ringt to it. It's a 'voices in your head because you're so partisan you're insane' ring to it.
Powerful corporate interests who would do such a thing are outside your cult ideology, and so you simply can't see it when it happens, and you post tripe like you did to deny it.
I'm not saying the story is true or not, I'm saying how you would react if it is.
Moonbeam, the answer to your question: Heartsurgeon, by a long shot.
I like Kucinich too. He's my likely pick among the current crop running.
Oh, if only I could be as objective and unpartisan as you craig :brokenheart::roll:
Perhaps your too objective to remember all of Perots claims just before the end.
I am not saying thier two peas in a pod just that I think Kucinich is as squirly as ross
turned out to be.
I'm sure with your weight thrown behind Dennis, he's a shoe in:laugh:
You fail to disprove your extremely high level of partisanship with the misuse of sarcasm.
I remember Perot's claims, his daughter's wedding being in jeopardy of disruption. I don't know the full story behind them.
You think Kucinich is 'squirrely' (well, squirly (sic)). It's hard to respond to thin air.
But you do miss the point yet again. My expression of support for Kucinich is for the issues and his qualities, not for the effect on his odds.
You are implicitly suggesting that no one should discuss who they favor in the election in this message board discussion forum. Yay for you and your misguided nonsense.
Using your misguided logic, there's not much point in any one person voting, either, since one vote is all but certainly not going to change the election.
Why do you hate our democracy so much? (If you answer 'because it elected Bush', you will gain one point with me, giving you a total of... one point).