Please Lock

[JD50]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: alchemize
BRB, going to find the original text of the "bet". I believe that the terms of the bet were covered by both of us, and hence it was a "tie".

I actually never agreed to the bet but you were so gung-ho about it, i humored you by finding your partisan hack posts (even more than you wanted me to find)

If you had any honor, you wouldn't post out of shame

Well if you didn't agree to the bet then it's a little stupid for him to honor it.

 

[alchemize]

OK, here's the original wager, that Phokus never agreed to, but claims to have won and I lost. I will grant that he found 10 posts from me that were probably trolling, and some of them could have been construed as partisan. I quickly did the same. Somehow he won, I lost. Don't play monopoly with Phokus

But I prefer to raise the stakes in the internets dramas. Let's have a wager. If you can find 10 posts from me in the last 6 months that would be considered "partisan" - i.e. towing the republican party line, I'll take 6 months off from this board. If I can find 20 from doing the same for the democrat line in the past 6 months, you'll take 3 months off. Deal?

From this thread

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: cliftonite
What is the point of this? Aren't both of you taking this a little too seriously? Surely you have real lives that preoccupies you from time to time?

It's a prelude to the crazy mad make up sex..

Saturday night, drama on the internet. What could be more fun? Besides, anyone in this thread has no excuse questioning real lives

 

[dali71]

Originally posted by: cliftonite
I can't wait for the ignore feature of VB.

So you saw a thread that clearly held no interest for you, yet still felt the need to post in it twice?

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: alchemize
OK, here's the original wager, that Phokus never agreed to, but claims to have won and I lost. I will grant that he found 10 posts from me that were probably trolling, and some of them could have been construed as partisan. I quickly did the same. Somehow he won, I lost. Don't play monopoly with Phokus

But I prefer to raise the stakes in the internets dramas. Let's have a wager. If you can find 10 posts from me in the last 6 months that would be considered "partisan" - i.e. towing the republican party line, I'll take 6 months off from this board. If I can find 20 from doing the same for the democrat line in the past 6 months, you'll take 3 months off. Deal?

If you were honest, instead of a piece of shit, you'd admit i found MORE than 10

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: alchemize
BRB, going to find the original text of the "bet". I believe that the terms of the bet were covered by both of us, and hence it was a "tie".

I actually never agreed to the bet but you were so gung-ho about it, i humored you by finding your partisan hack posts (even more than you wanted me to find)

If you had any honor, you wouldn't post out of shame

Well if you didn't agree to the bet then it's a little stupid for him to honor it.

He went along with it like it was a done deal. If he had any honor, he'd stop posting. Alchemize arrogantly comes off as an independent/neutral poster who isn't affiliated with either party, claims that he's 'not a republican', but spends most of the time bashing liberals and liberal causes. He was so arrogant that he didn't think anyone would be able to find partisan posts from him. Fake as fuck.

 

[alchemize]

And I could have found many many more than 20 for you. So let's settle it here.

What do you have to fear? This forum is relatively left leaning, it's basically a rigged contest. All I have is some feeble hope that you are such a hack that some will actually look past their politics and see the truth.

So, are we agreed?

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: alchemize
And I could have found many many more than 20 for you. So let's settle it here.

What do you have to fear? This forum is relatively left leaning, it's basically a rigged contest. All I have is some feeble hope that you are such a hack that some will actually look past their politics and see the truth.

So, are we agreed?

Hahaha, bullshit it's 'left leaning'

No doubt the right hates me (for good reason too) and would no doubt try to stack the polls against me.

You guys have gotten a lot of 'courage' since obama was elected.

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: alchemize
BRB, going to find the original text of the "bet". I believe that the terms of the bet were covered by both of us, and hence it was a "tie".

I actually never agreed to the bet but you were so gung-ho about it, i humored you by finding your partisan hack posts (even more than you wanted me to find)

If you had any honor, you wouldn't post out of shame

Well if you didn't agree to the bet then it's a little stupid for him to honor it.

He went along with it like it was a done deal. If he had any honor, he'd stop posting. Alchemize arrogantly comes off as an independent/neutral poster who isn't affiliated with either party, claims that he's 'not a republican', but spends most of the time bashing liberals and liberal causes. He was so arrogant that he didn't think anyone would be able to find partisan posts from him. Fake as fuck.

Actually you posted the first response as if it was a done deal. Anyone can reference the thread for the truth.

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: alchemize
BRB, going to find the original text of the "bet". I believe that the terms of the bet were covered by both of us, and hence it was a "tie".

I actually never agreed to the bet but you were so gung-ho about it, i humored you by finding your partisan hack posts (even more than you wanted me to find)

If you had any honor, you wouldn't post out of shame

Well if you didn't agree to the bet then it's a little stupid for him to honor it.

He went along with it like it was a done deal. If he had any honor, he'd stop posting. Alchemize arrogantly comes off as an independent/neutral poster who isn't affiliated with either party, claims that he's 'not a republican', but spends most of the time bashing liberals and liberal causes. He was so arrogant that he didn't think anyone would be able to find partisan posts from him. Fake as fuck.

Actually you posted the first response as if it was a done deal. Anyone can reference the thread for the truth.

Nope, never agreed to it, even after i copy/pasted your posts, i was just humoring your and making you look like a total fucking moron that you were

BTW, i didn't agree to this challenge, the issue was never my partisanship (did i ever deny being partisan?) It was ***YOUR*** partisanship after i the pot-kettle-black comment.

If you had any integrity, you'd stop posting for 6 months.

See you back on Wednesday, December 2, 2009!

http://www.timeanddate.com/dat...e=add&ay=&am=6&ad=&aw=

 

[Phokus]

BTW, i didn't agree to this challenge, the issue was never my partisanship (did i ever deny being partisan?) It was ***YOUR*** partisanship after i the pot-kettle-black comment.

If you had any integrity, you'd stop posting for 6 months.

See you back on Wednesday, December 2, 2009!

http://www.timeanddate.com/dat...e=add&ay=&am=6&ad=&aw=

And seeing this post again, i fully admit i was partisan back then and do now. That was never the issue, Alchemize. The issue was that you were/are a hypocritical piece of shit, as i so aptly demonstrated.

 

[alchemize]

I would offer the same argument to you, in fact, I did offer to stop posting for six months if you stopped for three.

So you didn't agree to the challenge, so there was no challenge, but you insist I lost, and I have no honor, even though I "won" according to my terms also. Interesting how your mind thinks.

So do you agree to the terms? Would you like to modify them?

 

[alchemize]

So would you like to change it to who is the bigger hypocritical piece of shit now?

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: alchemize
OK, question is simple, and I believe the mods said this was OK.

Who is the bigger partisan hack, myself or Phokus. Loser stops posting, forever. If it's me, I'll reset my password to some random characters so I can't login again.

Voting ends at Midnight, Tuesday July 14th, EST.

Phokus, please acknowledge that you agree to the terms and I'll put up the survey. It will simply read:

"Who is the bigger partisan hack, alchemize or phokus"
answers:
alchemize
Phokus

What the hell is with you? Do you seriously think I would express an opinion that would end one of your posting careers? What do you take me for, some sort of vicious shit that would delight in seeing one of you gone. Your self importance and the depth of your hostility amazes me?

In the first place, to think that you are even worthy of some consideration in this matter is self flattery in the extreme. Don't you realize your existence may be like a fly buzzing against the window of my neighbor's house and of no relevance whatsoever to me?

Or why would I chose one of my brothers over another when I am supposed to love everybody? Do not call upon me to define who survives and who goes. I am a nobody and my opinion is totally worthless. How could I possibly know which of you is the bigger hack. What the fuck is a hack and who cares? The river flows to the sea, and the pebbles and boulders it flows around are part of the river bed, like salt and pepper in my soup. In my garden manure turns into fruit. In my soup I put both salt and pepper. Salt and pepper are grains and flakes, but I do not count them or give each a name.

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: alchemize
So would you like to change it to who is the bigger hypocritical piece of shit now?

How am i hypocritical? I admitted i was partisan back then and do now.

You came in into that thread with balls so big, it wouldn't fit in a wheelbarrow, thinking you yourself were 'clean' and above partisanship. Of course your balls shrank after i exposed your hypocritical self.

 

[Phokus]

I mean, shit, you're such a lying douchebag, you can't even admit i found more than 10 quotes from you.

 

[alchemize]

So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: alchemize
So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

I don't want this thread locked yet. Answer this question: based on the original challenge, despite whether or not you should've self banned yourself, do you admit that you're a hypocrite and partisan? I admitted i was partisan in that thread (and that was never the question).

 

[seemingly random]

Originally posted by: alchemize
So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

You're disturbing a whole lot more than moonie. This is embarrassing.

It seems that stalking and callouts are now acceptable.

 

[dmcowen674]

alchemize

 

[dali71]

Originally posted by: alchemize
So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

He'll never agree to the terms. Delusional as he is, he still knows that most people can't stand him, regardless of political affiliation.

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: seemingly random

Originally posted by: alchemize
So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

You're disturbing a whole lot more than moonie. This is embarrassing.

It seems that stalking and callouts are now acceptable.

he keeps tabs on which liberals do and don't post in obama bashing threads and then has the temerity to call ME obsessed. The guy's a fucking stalking freak.

 

[0marTheZealot]

The internet is srs bsns.

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: alchemize
So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

I don't want this thread locked yet. Answer this question: based on the original challenge, despite whether or not you should've self banned yourself, do you admit that you're a hypocrite and partisan? I admitted i was partisan in that thread (and that was never the question).

I'll answer that question if you admit you're a bigger partisan hack than I am.

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: alchemize
So, you don't agree to the terms? It's a simple yes or no. If the answer is no, I'll ask to have thread locked. I'm disturbing Moonbeam

I don't want this thread locked yet. Answer this question: based on the original challenge, despite whether or not you should've self banned yourself, do you admit that you're a hypocrite and partisan? I admitted i was partisan in that thread (and that was never the question).

I'll answer that question if you admit you're a bigger partisan hack than I am.

Bigger partisan? Perhaps. Bigger hack? Hahaha, at least i'm HONEST about my affiliation. You cloak yourself as an 'independent' when you're clearly not.