• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

please lock

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
OK, so no defense against your claims that there is a problem with the AMD chipsets ? more pissing in the wind.
 
Originally posted by: Markfw900
OK, so no defense against your claims that there is a problem with the AMD chipsets ? more pissing in the wind.

WTF? Trying addressing your topics in the appropriate thread. :roll: Come on now, your old enough to know that arent you? Or you think you can do what ever the hell you want? :roll:
 
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Markfw900
OK, so no defense against your claims that there is a problem with the AMD chipsets ? more pissing in the wind.

WTF? Trying addressing your topics in the appropriate thread. :roll: Come on now, your old enough to know that arent you? Or you think you can do what ever the hell you want? :roll:
Is your reading comprehension left your brain ? or was it never there to start with? Check about 10 replies up with the idiot that says the nforce3250 and the via KT800pro chipsets are both crap.....

 
I was referring to SATA Raid-0 performance on Intel vs NVIDIA/VIA/Sis chipsets. I guess you could bypass all of that and go SCSI, with new controllers from LSI and Adaptec, which run at 133Mhz ...

Of course in the future Nvidia will nforce 4, which sounds REALLY impressive...

Right now 133Mhz is not a reality on the AMD platform.... you have to settle for 66Mhz.

Not all of us are 'gamers' you know. I have invested more in storage than the price of a top-of-the-line videocard so I hope you can see where I'm coming from.
 
Originally posted by: Tasque
I was referring to SATA Raid-0 performance on Intel vs NVIDIA/VIA/Sis chipsets. I guess you could bypass all of that and go SCSI, with new controllers from LSI and Adaptec, which run at 133Mhz ...

Of course in the future Nvidia will nforce 4, which sounds REALLY impressive...

Right now 133Mhz is not a reality on the AMD platform.... you have to settle for 66Mhz.

Not all of us are 'gamers' you know. I have invested more in storage than the price of a top-of-the-line videocard so I hope you can see where I'm coming from.
Excuse me ? my Tyan board has PCI-X 133 mhz slots on it.... What are you talking about ?

 
Originally posted by: clarkey01
we dont have to flame, I just want to make a point mik3y, I believe you had the same view as me on the last thread...ah well.

yes, we do have the same views. 🙂 but it's a crazy hot flame. it's gotta be the biggest argument i've read here at anandtech.
 
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Originally posted by: Tasque
I was referring to SATA Raid-0 performance on Intel vs NVIDIA/VIA/Sis chipsets. I guess you could bypass all of that and go SCSI, with new controllers from LSI and Adaptec, which run at 133Mhz ...

Of course in the future Nvidia will nforce 4, which sounds REALLY impressive...

Right now 133Mhz is not a reality on the AMD platform.... you have to settle for 66Mhz.

Not all of us are 'gamers' you know. I have invested more in storage than the price of a top-of-the-line videocard so I hope you can see where I'm coming from.
Excuse me ? my Tyan board has PCI-X 133 mhz slots on it.... What are you talking about ?

You're talking Opteron....
 
Originally posted by: Tasque
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Originally posted by: Tasque
I was referring to SATA Raid-0 performance on Intel vs NVIDIA/VIA/Sis chipsets. I guess you could bypass all of that and go SCSI, with new controllers from LSI and Adaptec, which run at 133Mhz ...

Of course in the future Nvidia will nforce 4, which sounds REALLY impressive...

Right now 133Mhz is not a reality on the AMD platform.... you have to settle for 66Mhz.

Not all of us are 'gamers' you know. I have invested more in storage than the price of a top-of-the-line videocard so I hope you can see where I'm coming from.
Excuse me ? my Tyan board has PCI-X 133 mhz slots on it.... What are you talking about ?

You're talking Opteron....
And that isn't AMD ? Any the FX-53 won't work in a socket 940 single socket with this ? (they are aout there) Reasearch... google is your friend....

 
That is completely true but.....
If you already had intel you only need to change the chip instead of buying the mdb,memory and chip.
I think buying the chip will be the same as buying the new mdb,memory and fx-53.
stop being so negative about his new ride. you problably still on amd 700 mhz with 256 of pc100 and complaining about others
 
Originally posted by: virgilio
That is completely true but.....
If you already had intel you only need to change the chip instead of buying the mdb,memory and chip.
I think buying the chip will be the same as buying the new mdb,memory and fx-53.
stop being so negative about his new ride. you problably still on amd 700 mhz with 256 of pc100 and complaining about others

WTF ???
 
I can see where you're going, with this. K8W, is nice, but I'd take a Supermicro over a Tyan any day, pal....you have your MX-8 I have my M-5.

 
RX-8, not MX. And I know about the BMW M3, but what is an M5 ?
Edit: Its a concept car, and like I believe you have one ?
 
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Originally posted by: virgilio
That is completely true but.....
If you already had intel you only need to change the chip instead of buying the mdb,memory and chip.
I think buying the chip will be the same as buying the new mdb,memory and fx-53.
stop being so negative about his new ride. you problably still on amd 700 mhz with 256 of pc100 and complaining about others

WTF ???

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by: Tasque
RX-8 rotary engine right?

You really don't know what an M5 is?
Yes, it just googled it, its a concept car. If you have one, post a picture in your driveway...
If not shut up... You are as bad as Felix. Or are all P4EE owners this stupid..
 
M5 is not a concept car.

I can't post one right now, I'm at school, and I didn't bring it to the states in the first place. I could easily search the net and find one parked in somebody's driveway, but I won't.... if you don't believe it, tuff luck. I'd rather sit back and look down at you living in your little world where everything you possess is 'supposedly' top in it's class....
 
Originally posted by: Tasque
M5 is not a concept car.

I can't post one right now, I'm at school, and I didn't bring it to the states in the first place. I could easily search the net and find one parked in somebody's driveway, but I won't.... if you don't believe it, tuff luck. I'd rather sit back and look down at you living in your little world where everything you possess is 'supposedly' top in it's class....
RX-8 isn't nescassarily top in its class. Matter of opinion. But BMW says the M5 is a concept car, so I call

BS
 
tasque, ever heard of the "edit" button?

quit spamming stupid crap and flaming mark.

and the M5 is both concept and not a concept. the customized v-10 one is a concept, otherwise, the normal M5 is just a poor rich man's toy.
 
Back
Top