Please compare your 3DMark05 CPU score to my OC'd XP-M : )

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
M

Mjvyxyn

Banned
May 19, 2006
602
0
0
*Update* : SS of my OC in my sig : )

I want to see how everyone here scores against my CPU in 3DMark05.

Please list your CPU actual AMD P-Rating or the Model of Intel *Cough*craptastic CPU and list the speed's at which you ran to get your CPU score. Please include the FSB, HTT multi and any other multi and the core voltage used along with the final core speed and effective FSB of your CPU ( for those that can't fig it out on thier own ).

I got a final CPU score of 4581 after averaging out the socres of 4 runs.

*Update* : My CPU scored 4813 average after 4 runs last night after tweaking the OS down to 17 running processes ( including 3DMark05 ) and the highest of the 4 scores was 4915 : )

My CPU :

AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+
239x10.5 ( comes out to 239.5x10.5 )
1.975v in bios ( 1.9v to 1.97v actual )
2515mhz core with 479mhz effective FSB

*Update* : Here are the 4 runs from this morning without tweaking my OS, though I did kill like 6 processes that were left from when I had internet access on my PC ( No I don't have the net for myself anymore, I use my friends till I leavew the state ).

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Run 4

Average of the 4 runs is 4756 : )
 
DrMrLordX

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,886
12,943
136
I don't see why anyone would bother knocking Intel CPUs while bragging about some old Athlon XP-M. They were good back in the day, but cmon . . .
 
S

sanitydc

Member
Aug 26, 2006
172
0
0
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
I don't see why anyone would bother knocking Intel CPUs while bragging about some old Athlon XP-M. They were good back in the day, but cmon . . .
Click to expand...

he's retro.

 
C

Csst

Member
Aug 19, 2006
179
0
0
Where the screen shots i haven't ran that test myself but i still would like to see some screen shots.
 
M

Mjvyxyn

Banned
May 19, 2006
602
0
0
I'll take some SS's tonight and post them tomorrow. I'll also copy the readout I get after running 2DMark05 and post that here.

And yes I am retro and the XP-M's can handle arround 2v off of air but it's not recommended. The XP-M's also have a higher thermal threshold of arround 100*C whereas the desktop bartons are about 85*C max : )

If you look deep into it the desktop bartons are said to have a max safe vcore of about 1.85 whereas the mobile bartons can handle 1.95v to 2v with about the same level of relative safety.

And considering my CPU has never ever broken 52*C I'd think I still have a ways to go as I won't even see errors due to heat till close to 60*C.

On another note I tweaked my OS last night and scored 4813 average for 4 runs on 3DMArk05 with a high score of 4915 on the CPU score part : ) That was with only 17 windows processes running ( including 3DMark05 ) whereas my previous runs were with 37 processes ( including 3DMark05 )
 
Maximilian

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
I don't see why anyone would bother knocking Intel CPUs while bragging about some old Athlon XP-M. They were good back in the day, but cmon . . .
Click to expand...

Beats reading another thread about an athlon 64 knocking intel chips, theyre boring now :(

Plus the 2500 XP-M is still a very capable CPU today even for games. I sold my dual athlon MP rig and bought a cheaper dual opteron one instead, opty 842's replacing throughbred? 2000+'s. Good chips.
 
DrMrLordX

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,886
12,943
136
Originally posted by: Soviet

Beats reading another thread about an athlon 64 knocking intel chips, theyre boring now :(
Click to expand...

Now you don't get to see many of those either, unless it's OCHungry posting.

Plus the 2500 XP-M is still a very capable CPU today even for games.
Click to expand...

Yeah, though I don't think there are any XP-M boards out there that support PCI-e are there? That's pretty restrictive in and of itself. Honestly it's more the platform that would irk me than anything else with one of those thesedays.

They were excellent overclockers in their heydey, but that's over now. I'd rather have a Conroe-L to play with if I wanted a single core chip.


 
B

betasub

Platinum Member
Mar 22, 2006
2,677
0
0
MJVyxyn: nice going pushing that XP-M OC. You've squeezed a lot of useful info into that jpg of your (800x600?) desktop.
 
M

Mjvyxyn

Banned
May 19, 2006
602
0
0
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2194854

Specs in sig 24/7 rig

Now can you go away if you're gonna hate on Intel like that
Click to expand...

I thought the fact that you could heat your house off of all of the Pentiums after the PIII and before the newest Core Duo's spoke for itself in terms of how bad INTEL sucked. Oh, not to mention there is no way in hell any P4 can match an equivelant core speed on an AXP in any benchmark. 3.2ghz core on an AXP would crush any P4 at 3.2ghz and we all know it.

It's not how big your core speed is, it's what your CPU does with it that counts : )

Intel = crap ( except for the PIII and the other Mobile Pentium CPU's )

AMD = Effeciency similar to that of the MAC G series and mhz for mhz will own an INTEL CPU : )

In short my prefference is just that, my prefference. If you don't like it bite me : )

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
Originally posted by: Soviet

Beats reading another thread about an athlon 64 knocking intel chips, theyre boring now :(
Click to expand...

Now you don't get to see many of those either, unless it's OCHungry posting.

Plus the 2500 XP-M is still a very capable CPU today even for games.
Click to expand...

Yeah, though I don't think there are any XP-M boards out there that support PCI-e are there? That's pretty restrictive in and of itself. Honestly it's more the platform that would irk me than anything else with one of those thesedays.

They were excellent overclockers in their heydey, but that's over now. I'd rather have a Conroe-L to play with if I wanted a single core chip.
Click to expand...

And as far as 3D performance, not everyone gives a crap about the latest games on the highest settings, I still play AVP2 for crying out loud and have yet to be interested in F.E.A.R. or Oblivion but should I ever become engulfed by the desire to turn things up a notch I'll just hunt down a 512mb Gainward BLISS 7800GS with its 20 pipes ( basically a 512mb 7800GT as it uses a 7800GT core : ) Gainward BLISS 7800GS
 
cmdrdredd

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Originally posted by: MJVyxyn
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2194854

Specs in sig 24/7 rig

Now can you go away if you're gonna hate on Intel like that
Click to expand...

I thought the fact that you could heat your house off of all of the Pentiums after the PIII and before the newest Core Duo's spoke for itself in terms of how bad INTEL sucked. Oh, not to mention there is no way in hell any P4 can match an equivelant core speed on an AXP in any benchmark. 3.2ghz core on an AXP would crush any P4 at 3.2ghz and we all know it.

It's not how big your core speed is, it's what your CPU does with it that counts : )

Intel = crap ( except for the PIII and the other Mobile Pentium CPU's )

AMD = Effeciency similar to that of the MAC G series and mhz for mhz will own an INTEL CPU : )

In short my prefference is just that, my prefference. If you don't like it bite me : )

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
Originally posted by: Soviet

Beats reading another thread about an athlon 64 knocking intel chips, theyre boring now :(
Click to expand...

Now you don't get to see many of those either, unless it's OCHungry posting.

Plus the 2500 XP-M is still a very capable CPU today even for games.
Click to expand...

Yeah, though I don't think there are any XP-M boards out there that support PCI-e are there? That's pretty restrictive in and of itself. Honestly it's more the platform that would irk me than anything else with one of those thesedays.

They were excellent overclockers in their heydey, but that's over now. I'd rather have a Conroe-L to play with if I wanted a single core chip.
Click to expand...

And as far as 3D performance, not everyone gives a crap about the latest games on the highest settings, I still play AVP2 for crying out loud and have yet to be interested in F.E.A.R. or Oblivion but should I ever become engulfed by the desire to turn things up a notch I'll just hunt down a 512mb Gainward BLISS 7800GS with its 20 pipes ( basically a 512mb 7800GT as it uses a 7800GT core : ) Gainward BLISS 7800GS
Click to expand...


K so you're retarded. That's just like OCHungry. Did you even look at what my score was? probably not...STFU

And yes AMD did have some really garbage CPUs in it's time as well. Just because one is better than the other doesn't mean one sucks flat out.
 
Maximilian

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
Originally posted by: MJVyxyn
I thought the fact that you could heat your house off of all of the Pentiums after the PIII and before the newest Core Duo's spoke for itself in terms of how bad INTEL sucked. Oh, not to mention there is no way in hell any P4 can match an equivelant core speed on an AXP in any benchmark. 3.2ghz core on an AXP would crush any P4 at 3.2ghz and we all know it.

It's not how big your core speed is, it's what your CPU does with it that counts : )

Intel = crap ( except for the PIII and the other Mobile Pentium CPU's )

AMD = Effeciency similar to that of the MAC G series and mhz for mhz will own an INTEL CPU : )

In short my prefference is just that, my prefference. If you don't like it bite me : )
Click to expand...

The P4A/B/C's never had heat issues, in fact the AXP's were the ones that were considered toasty, palominos especially. Download and watch video 1 for a shred of proof

Also despite the AXP being more efficient the core speed DOES count, and the P4's of the time beat the AXP's in performance. In fact a 3200+ AXP dosent even equal a 3.2 ghz P4C, it gets mauled by it, its closer to a 2.8/3.0 P4C. Focus on facts, the AXP cant reach the speeds the P4 could, if it could then yeah it would be better but it *cant*.
 
DrMrLordX

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,886
12,943
136
Originally posted by: MJVyxyn

Intel = crap ( except for the PIII and the other Mobile Pentium CPU's )
Click to expand...

That's so one year ago.

AMD = Effeciency similar to that of the MAC G series and mhz for mhz will own an INTEL CPU : )
Click to expand...

See above comment.

In short my prefference is just that, my prefference. If you don't like it bite me : )
Click to expand...

So you prefer dated components? Yay.

And as far as 3D performance, not everyone gives a crap about the latest games on the highest settings, I still play AVP2 for crying out loud and have yet to be interested in F.E.A.R. or Oblivion
Click to expand...

Then why did you start this thread with a 3dmark score?

but should I ever become engulfed by the desire to turn things up a notch I'll just hunt down a 512mb Gainward BLISS 7800GS with its 20 pipes ( basically a 512mb 7800GT as it uses a 7800GT core : ) Gainward BLISS 7800GS
Click to expand...

. . . which means you miss out on superior 79xx-series cards that perform better than 78xx cards, use less power, and don't cost much more. It's nice that AGP still has a few pseudo-current cards out there, but we AGP users would do well not to delude ourselves into believing that we can buy anything current for our rigs.

I love my little Sempron and all, but there's no point in being such an AMD fanboi that I can't acknowledge Intel's current superiority. Hell, most AM2 systems out there would blow away that XP-M with a modest overclock. Sheesh. AMD yesterday vs AMD today, AMD today wins. Surprise surprise.

Originally posted by: Soviet
-double post-
Click to expand...

IN SOVIET RUSSIA, post doubles YOU!

(sorry, had to do that)
 
cubeless

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
i get 2288 on my 143fsb k7s5a mounted 2.28ghz rig...

it's a fire breathing, world stomping... oh, that was 4 years ago...

but it's still running and plays a bunch of games ok with a 9500 that's been brainwashed to think it's a hot rodded 9700pro...

and it's plenty fast to do just about everything else u do with a compooter...

but there's no doubt that it gets walloped by a a64 at the same ghz...

 
9

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
With my A64 at 2.8 GHz (255*11, 1.344V Actual,4X HT Multi, DDR2-620 3-4-4-12@2.0V) and my 7600GT at 600 core/1560 RAM, I got scores in the mid-6000s.
 
S

Sunbird

Golden Member
Jul 20, 2001
1,024
2
81
CPU:

AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice (skt939)
Bus speed x multiplier: 250x10
1.472v in bios
2502MHz core with RAM at 416MHz
HT multi: x 4 (1001MHz HT link)

3DMark2005 CPU score:
4661

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom