Playboy turns to hardcore porn

yobarman

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
11,642
1
0
Umm..I'm guessing this is borderline dumb to post this, but I can hardly contain myself.

"In an attempt to heat up profits, Playboy turns to hardcore porn" quoted from CNBC.
I just heard this seconds ago and I thought everyone should know about this. :D:D:D:D:D:D::D:D::D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Uh...I don't know what to think about this. Playboy has always had the prettier girls and it's always just been a tick classier because it was always softcore.

Does this mean famous women aren't gonna pose in it anymore?

Personally, If I ran Playboy and already had all the resources they do (ie photographers, connections into the seedy nudie underworld, etc.) I'd just make a fake corporation to sell the hardcore stuff. Just like Disney owns Miramax films and funded Nazi Germany
 

COWWATCHER

Banned
May 31, 2001
129
0
0


<< Uh...I don't know what to think about this. Playboy has always had the prettier girls and it's always just been a tick classier because it was always softcore.

Does this mean famous women aren't gonna pose in it anymore?
>>



they will probally have both softcore and hardcore...
 

Killbat

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
6,641
1
0
That sucks! :|

Playboy was classy! (as classy as porn can get anyway)

Give me those beautiful, sexy women over nasty smut whores any day.
 

zippy

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 1999
9,998
1
0
Radeon...don't you mean:

I'll be sticking it to my girlfriend.... ?????
 

hungrypete

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2000
3,001
0
0


<< That sucks! :|

Playboy was classy! (as classy as porn can get anyway)

Give me those beautiful, sexy women over nasty smut whores any day.
>>



what about beautiful, sexy women acting like smut whores???
 

StormRider

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2000
8,324
2
0
I still prefer real girls as opposed to the fake boobed, heavily made-up and air brushed girls of Playboy....
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
While it doesn't surprise me, the change is definitely for the worse.

Playboy (the magazine at least) had class.

:(

Viper GTS
 

Urinal Mint

Platinum Member
Jan 16, 2000
2,074
0
0
To quote Rodney Dangerfield: &quot;Why don't you call me some time when you don't have any class.&quot;
 

herself

Member
Jun 20, 2001
86
0
0
Oh, yuck... I used to have a subscription to Playboy... damn fine reading a good deal of the time... and you didn't have to deal with the penetration shots like in Penthouse... ugggg.

Man, the hardcore news is a real bummer :( :|

Tamara
 

yobarman

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
11,642
1
0


<< That sucks! :|

Playboy was classy! (as classy as porn can get anyway)

Give me those beautiful, sexy women over nasty smut whores any day.
>>




Maybe you're missing the best part... Beautiful, sexy women are going to be doing it, not nasty smut whores.
 

Siva

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2001
5,472
0
71
If you people would've bought playboy in the first place this wouldn't have happened! For shame :(
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Maybe you're missing the best part... Beautiful, sexy women are going to be doing it, not nasty smut whores.

No, by doing it they BECOME nasty smut whores.

To me, the appeal of Playboy magazine was attractive women without their clothes. I don't need to see holes, penetration, or anything else like that. I haven't owned (or seen) a Playboy in over a year, but I appreciated how tame they were.

Maybe it's not so bad, maybe they'll have a separate magazine or it'll just be the channel...

:(

Viper GTS
 

bigd480

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,580
0
0


<< Give me those beautiful, sexy women over nasty smut whores any day. >>

let's not kid ourselves... they're all nasty smut whores... they're in playboy semi-nude, artfully photographed and professionally airbrushed by day, and giving lap-dances and joeblobs at night...
 

Killbat

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
6,641
1
0
&quot;<< Give me those beautiful, sexy women over nasty smut whores any day. >>

let's not kid ourselves... they're all nasty smut whores... they're in playboy semi-nude, artfully photographed and professionally airbrushed by day, and giving lap-dances and joeblobs at night...&quot;

You're probably right about that, but that's irrelevant. It's the images in the magazine that are important. It's fantasy, remember?
 

iamthesystem

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
563
0
0


<< Oh, yuck... I used to have a subscription to Playboy... damn fine reading a good deal of the time... and you didn't have to deal with the penetration shots like in Penthouse... ugggg. >>



...penetration is bad????

how long will this thread go before it's locked?!@?!@?

:D