From the map they are showing on TV of the crash site compared to the two runways, this is definitely the case. There's no way that plane took off from the longer runway like it should have.Originally posted by: Engineer
From early reports, the pilot may have taken off on the wrong runway. He was supposed to take off on a 7,000 foot runway and instead, took off on a 3,500 foot runway.
My sister-in-law is a nurse on the 1st floor of the hospital the survivor is currently at (currently undergoing surgery). Luckily, she didn't have to work today, otherwise it would be a media frenzy over there right now. A local girl got hit by a train at some point in the past year, and she couldn't get work done because of the media that crowded that place. I can only imagine this is many times worse.......Originally posted by: jadinolf
One survivor in critical condition according to FNC.
Originally posted by: aswedc
Sucks to be the survivor if he's the pilot who chose the wrong runway...
They keep talking about a couple who were just married last night, and were on their way to their honeymoon early this morning who died on the flight. This was me just 3 months ago, leaving early Sunday morning on my honeymoon from this airport. It's kinda freaky when I think about it.Originally posted by: TripleAAA
It's kinda crazy. I just moved here a week ago and flew into the airport where that plane took out from. The crash site is like 3-5 miles from my house.
Originally posted by: blurredvision
They keep talking about a couple who were just married last night, and were on their way to their honeymoon early this morning who died on the flight. This was me just 3 months ago, leaving early Sunday morning on my honeymoon from this airport. It's kinda freaky when I think about it.Originally posted by: TripleAAA
It's kinda crazy. I just moved here a week ago and flew into the airport where that plane took out from. The crash site is like 3-5 miles from my house.
Originally posted by: Scouzer
...ATC should have thought "hmmm...an RJ is a piece of crap, it shouldn't take off that runway". that runway would be quite below minimum TORA required for a CRJ
Originally posted by: Dunbar
Originally posted by: Scouzer
...ATC should have thought "hmmm...an RJ is a piece of crap, it shouldn't take off that runway". that runway would be quite below minimum TORA required for a CRJ
If it was foggy, the tower wouldn't know which runway they were taking off from. They would give the instructions to taxi to the longer runway and it would be up to the pilots to get there (since I doubt they have ground radar at such a small airport.) I would think a CRJ could get off the ground in 3500 feet of ground roll.
Originally posted by: Scouzer
Nope...look at previous posts, the RJ needs a minimum of 5007ft...that's not accounting for 900FT MSL and temperature correction.
But I didn't read it was foggy...definitely 100% pilot fault.