- Apr 17, 2008
- 138
- 0
- 0
My $2k-ish rig is finally ordered and on the way! Most of the internals are sitting in my room right now. The case is coming in tommorrow, with the Planar following it the day after, and the GPU hitting town Saturday. They were the last parts ordered, and the decisions that were most "up in the air" until the last moment.
I went with the Planar because I wanted a newer IPS panel under $800. That narrowed it down to the Planar, the Doublesight, or the newer HP LP2475w. IMO, Doublesight really screwed the pooch on the DS-265W. That leaves the HP, which is a very sexy little monitor. And I'd have gone with it, but after shipping and taxes the HP came within $60 of the Planar in my state. So I said "F*** it" and ordered the Planar.
The Planar is supposed to be pretty good. Better quality control than the DS monitors, with better support and warranties/dead pixel policies. I'd like 1-2 more inputs, though, and I keep hearing bitching about the "white glow" and some color banding. Others hate the wide-gamut thing. I haven't seen a monitor that's "perfect" yet for under $1k, so we'll see how I feel about this one once it's set up and in my house. I'm hoping to use an existing profile from someone who's calibrated to get "in the ballpark" on some values, since I really don't want to have to buy a colorimeter. If it comes to that, I'll probably send it back instead and go with a BenQ TN or something, and pocket the change.
Another toughy was the decision about going with the 4870, 4870 1gb, the 260, or the newer 216 variants. Anandtech's review leaned heavily towards the 4870 1gb, but I didn't find the disparity in performance at 1900x1200 that persuasive. My vanilla 216 should run cooler, quieter, and overclock like a champ. I intend to take it up to 620mhz core or better on air, which should net me similar FPS to the EVGA "Superclocked" 216. Add to that the lack of lifetime warranty on the 1gb cards (no Leadtek yet) and the step-up program on the EVGA, and I went with the NV boys on this one.
Tough calls. Hope I don't regret 'em!
-S
I went with the Planar because I wanted a newer IPS panel under $800. That narrowed it down to the Planar, the Doublesight, or the newer HP LP2475w. IMO, Doublesight really screwed the pooch on the DS-265W. That leaves the HP, which is a very sexy little monitor. And I'd have gone with it, but after shipping and taxes the HP came within $60 of the Planar in my state. So I said "F*** it" and ordered the Planar.
The Planar is supposed to be pretty good. Better quality control than the DS monitors, with better support and warranties/dead pixel policies. I'd like 1-2 more inputs, though, and I keep hearing bitching about the "white glow" and some color banding. Others hate the wide-gamut thing. I haven't seen a monitor that's "perfect" yet for under $1k, so we'll see how I feel about this one once it's set up and in my house. I'm hoping to use an existing profile from someone who's calibrated to get "in the ballpark" on some values, since I really don't want to have to buy a colorimeter. If it comes to that, I'll probably send it back instead and go with a BenQ TN or something, and pocket the change.
Another toughy was the decision about going with the 4870, 4870 1gb, the 260, or the newer 216 variants. Anandtech's review leaned heavily towards the 4870 1gb, but I didn't find the disparity in performance at 1900x1200 that persuasive. My vanilla 216 should run cooler, quieter, and overclock like a champ. I intend to take it up to 620mhz core or better on air, which should net me similar FPS to the EVGA "Superclocked" 216. Add to that the lack of lifetime warranty on the 1gb cards (no Leadtek yet) and the step-up program on the EVGA, and I went with the NV boys on this one.
Tough calls. Hope I don't regret 'em!
-S