I would agree with that. I definitely would not have bought the game if not for this post. As it is, it was a pretty fun game. It is just your average business simulator type game, and I played through it until I beat it which is better than most of the games I have.It's a pretty clever marketing.
Here are some combos I found to work:
I made a Fallout clone (I called it Fall-in) and made $26M off it near the beginning of the game. Just think of the game blockbusters that were around the last 30 years, and using those almost always gets great reviews and sales. Monkey Island works, Diablo works, (the sierra games don't seem to work though), Shadow Run works (I made over $100M on that title), Grand Turismo works, Flight Simulator works, DDR was a big seller for me. Any combo that doesn't follow a known block-buster seems to do poorly however.
If it's anything like porn, there are plenty of hoarders or people who play like 5 minutes and then forget about the game. For goodness's sake look at Steam, which is legit: how many people buy games on Steam sales "because it's cheap" and then don't even play the games much if at all? The forums are overflowing with people with massive backlogs of such games. It stands to reason that there are a lot of pirates who download things because it's "free" and then hardly even touch most of it.
Game is tough. I can't make any money on anything after the gameboy. It gets worse when you get a massive hit and upgrade your shop. I couldn't get anything good churned out.
I wish more real data on piracy were released. Developers tend to me mum on it. And then the detractors are all like "it doesn't affect developers at all so piracy is fine!!.." Sigh.
Though that's kind of like "I wish I knew how many crimes were actually committed wherever in one day", there really is no way to know.
Kinda reminds me of the days of Titan Quest where cracked versions would hit a certain point in the game and just hard lock. Many people complained on the forums, the devs knew those people were running pirated copies. Problem blew up on them though because they didn't push that out quickly enough and the game got a bad reputation for crashing (although the crashes were directly due to the crack not the legit copies).
I remember playing DarkStar which had a similar dection/issue. it would randomly make the video card behave as if it was over heating. Generally on each space mission (space jump / base exit). It might have also fiddled with the AI in places or the money earnt in others, but the graphics one was the most noticable.
Lots of issues reporting it, but in the end the developers said nothing and would not help those people. While my game was legit, I had the issue as well. It turned out, after a lot of self testing, that it did not like any virtual cd/dvd drives or even having two optical drives in the system the game was being run on. By this time I had finished the game and just told everyone else to avoid it.
Some cities have a law enforcement program that uses google maps to show all crimes in the city and the category of the crime (stolen vehicle, drunk and disorderly, etc etc). It cost money though apparently and for that reason my city doesn't do it
Of course it doesn't tell you that, so it took a while to figure out, then I didn't bother to play the demo because if the demo is like that, then I can logically expect more crappiness from the full version.
Unfortunately what the publishers learned from that was not to make demos available.
*puts hand up*
I have a question.
Why would anyone want to play such a game?
Well sure but really, why does that matter? They still pirated the game. I know you're not really arguing that they didn't pirate the game but your post is a common rationale of people I know as to why they pirate. It's an excuse and a ridiculous one at that. "but sir, I didn't really intend to jerk off to all that kiddie porn, I just archive it".
For the record, I don't pirate PC games, but your analogy is so bad that I have to comment. A stolen motorcycle means you can't sell it--it's gone. With digital, the original copy remains and can be sold. In reality, piracy is exaggerated as a problem if you look only at downloads, because as articles over the years have pointed out (as well as Stardock's CEO), not every download is a lost sale at full price. There are some people who download a lot of stuff but never actually play it (whether games, films, or whatever... we all know a hoarder who doesn't have enough years in his/her life to actually watch all the films he pirates). There are some who would not have purchased the game AT ALL so they aren't exactly a lost sale either, though if they do something brazen like call customer support and thus cost the company something, they are a net drag. There are some who buy games but also download the cracked version because they don't like the DRM (convenience, compatibility, etc.). There are some who wouldn't have bought the game at full price but at a reduced price, so the cost of that piracy is less than you might think.
We're not really disagreeing on much but I will say I don't quite agree that my analogy was inept. It's not the idea that I'm comparing kiddie porn to pirating games but rather the rationale. The rest of it was more for sarcastic value. Still I think it's silly the ends people go through to justify piracy and frankly I don't necessarily agree with your DRM post either. Just my opinion though.
I don't think all piracy is equal. Pirating the avengers which grossed 600 million dollars in theaters alone, with the main actor getting paid $50 million for 3 months of work, I just don't feel bad about pirating that. I'm not a fan of the wealth distribution in most of the world and people making 50 mill for 3 months of not very difficult work is bullshit. 1% of the world's population owns 85% of the wealth according to wikipedia, while the bottom 50% own 1% of the wealth. I don't pirate many pc games, hardly any at all, and I do buy a lot of games (probably spent about $500 so far this year). when I was a broke kid I did pirate a lot though.
I realize its the way the world is set up right now, but I don't really get why there are so many defenders seeing as it's fairly fucked up. I think most people don't have a good understanding of just how rich the rich people of the world actually are and how fucked up it actually is. One thing's for sure though, it is in the best interest of politicians to keep things gravy for the richest people since they end up getting most of their money from them in return for subsidies/kickbacks/bailouts/law reforms/etc, so it wont change anytime soon. Until then I wont be losing any sleep about people pirating media that is feeding the pockets of the top 1%.