Arkaign
Lifer
- Oct 27, 2006
- 20,736
- 1,377
- 126
Make no mistake, Apple will probably do an HD Audio marketing thing before long. I've done blind tests with people on not even very high end audio, and they can immediately tell the difference when I play a standard iTunes version of the song back to back with a good FLAC copy.
As for Piracy, I admit to downloading better versions of songs that I already own the physical CD of, usually pristine vinyl to FLAC rips, which sound better than the CDs did in the first place. But you can damn well bet I would pay good money for super high quality versions of songs.
FLAC/Lossless from a CD source is good, but not amazing or anything, it's just a bit better than current iTunes/MP3 standards.
What would kick major ass is remasters from source to very high definition lossless audio formats. This probably wouldn't be all that widespread on current catalogs just given the hassle of digging out old masters and such, but could fairly easily become standard procedure for new releases.
I don't mind spending a buck a track on stuff I like, and I'd go 50% higher for really good HD versions of the same.
As for Piracy, I admit to downloading better versions of songs that I already own the physical CD of, usually pristine vinyl to FLAC rips, which sound better than the CDs did in the first place. But you can damn well bet I would pay good money for super high quality versions of songs.
FLAC/Lossless from a CD source is good, but not amazing or anything, it's just a bit better than current iTunes/MP3 standards.
What would kick major ass is remasters from source to very high definition lossless audio formats. This probably wouldn't be all that widespread on current catalogs just given the hassle of digging out old masters and such, but could fairly easily become standard procedure for new releases.
I don't mind spending a buck a track on stuff I like, and I'd go 50% higher for really good HD versions of the same.