Pillowcase rapist to be released a third time

[Wreckem]

Silly thing about these cases is the offender is given a limited sentence period instead of preventative detention, especially after repeat offending.....Me, Id just chop of his c**k....

Edit:

Apparently there are two "pillowcase" rapists from CA from around the same time.

That said I do believe the one in the OP finished his criminal sentence in 1996 and has since that time been detained civilly under CA's Sexually Violent Predators Act. The other one linked to ~200 rapes has been out since 1995(well until 2011 as he is currently in prison for failure to register as a sex offender). The later one would have been detained indefinitely if he wasn't released for good behavior after 16 years. Basically they parole the white pillowcase rapist repeatedly, he screws up repeatedly and his sentences aren't over until 1996 but CA crafts a new law specifically to detain him indefinitely. They do not parole the black pillowcase rapist, he gets out on good behavior months before the new law goes into effect that allows offenders to be detained indefinitely once their criminal sentences are over.

The biggest issue here, for both pillowcase rapists, is when the crimes were committed. The US was incredibility soft on sexual crimes until fairly recently, both in terms of sentencing and in terms of statutes of limitations. These days both guys would be in jail without the possibility of parole. Its the same way with DUIs. You commonly hear of stories were so and so was driving drunk and killed someone. They had 18 prior DUI's, and people ask why they weren't already in jail. They weren't because the persons previous DUIs were all when DUIs weren't serious offenses.

 

[Juddog]

Cut off his balls and penis and release him; he won't be raping anybody after that.

 

[sgrinavi]

Cut off his balls and penis and release him; he won't be raping anybody after that.

Odds are that chopping off his junk won't change his behavior - it's about domination and violence - not sex

 

[Juddog]

Odds are that chopping off his junk won't change his behavior - it's about domination and violence - not sex

He won't be able to rape without a penis. He won't be able to get his constant testosterone pump without his testes.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

He won't be able to rape without a penis. He won't be able to get his constant testosterone pump without his testes.

Cut off his balls and pump him full of the sex change hormones.

 

[sgrinavi]

He won't be able to rape without a penis. He won't be able to get his constant testosterone pump without his testes.

No, he'll shove a baseball bat up their butts. Rape is not about sex.

 

[Juddog]

No, he'll shove a baseball bat up their butts. Rape is not about sex.

Generally without the testosterone from their nuts fueling their need to become dominant, the aggressiveness which leads to rape would decline.

 

[MrColin]

If they publicize it enough, he will eventually have enough groupies to take care of him for free.

 

[woolfe9998]

Super suprised that there hasn't been even one extremist defending this guy. Could my little P&N be growing up?

Who actually "defends" heinous criminals around here? I've never actually seen that. I've seen people who oppose the death penalty and the other kinds of cruel and unusual punishments often proposed in these kinds of threads. In my view, it's the people who advocate torture and mutilation who are extremists.

So far as this case is concerned, it sounds like he should never have gotten out, if he really was convicted of that many rapes. Then again, there may be details I'm not aware of. The problem, however, is that he should have gotten life in prison ages ago. He wasn't even IN jail this time. He was incarcerated under a statute that allows sex offenders to be committed even after having served their sentence. I think once people do their time, it's a gross violation of rights to incarcerate them again. So the problem might not be so much letting him out now as that a long, long time ago he should have been given life.

 

[T9D]

No, he'll shove a baseball bat up their butts. Rape is not about sex.

I hate when people say this and just repeat the drivel some psychologist piss out.

Although Violence and anger are a big part of it, they aren't going to get a boner if sex isn't a part of it. It still feels good to them and gets them aroused. They see something they want and they take it. It's like saying stealing is not about having the money. They are still human beings no matter how screwed up they act. They don't suddenly have no sex desire because they are criminals.

 

[rommelrommel]

He won't be able to rape without a penis. He won't be able to get his constant testosterone pump without his testes.

And then shoot him?