• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

PiFAST is cool

Toadster

Senior member
PiFast Download

Program : PiFast version 4.3 (fix 1), by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 1000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 128 K
Physical memory used : ~ 7769 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Tue Aug 22 22:18:37 2006
End : Tue Aug 22 22:18:39 2006
Duration : 1.55 seconds
============================================================
Total computation time : 1.55 seconds (~ 0.00 hours)
============================================================
 

Program : PiFast version 4.3 (fix 1), by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 1000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 128 K
Physical memory used : ~ 7769 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Wed Aug 23 11:58:12 2006
End : Wed Aug 23 11:58:16 2006
Duration : 4.36 seconds
============================================================
Total computation time : 4.36 seconds (~ 0.00 hours)
============================================================
 
bull (if your desktop link is accurate)

You're correct, in that my desktop link is no longer accurate. 1.25 seconds is from my new system, which is an overclocked Core 2 E6600 w/ 2 GB of RAM. I haven't tried it on my old desktop, though with the scaling I've generally seen, it would probably take 2+ seconds on that system.
 
Originally posted by: Some1ne
bull (if your desktop link is accurate)

You're correct, in that my desktop link is no longer accurate. 1.25 seconds is from my new system, which is an overclocked Core 2 E6600 w/ 2 GB of RAM. I haven't tried it on my old desktop, though with the scaling I've generally seen, it would probably take 2+ seconds on that system.


whew! i was gonna say, my C2D better not be slower than your old AMD box 😉
 
Back
Top