• We are currently experiencing delays with our email service, which may affect logins and notifications. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience while we work to resolve the issue.

PiFAST is cool

Toadster

Senior member
Nov 21, 1999
598
0
76
scoop.intel.com
PiFast Download

Program : PiFast version 4.3 (fix 1), by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 1000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 128 K
Physical memory used : ~ 7769 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Tue Aug 22 22:18:37 2006
End : Tue Aug 22 22:18:39 2006
Duration : 1.55 seconds
============================================================
Total computation time : 1.55 seconds (~ 0.00 hours)
============================================================
 

toekramp

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2001
8,426
2
0

Program : PiFast version 4.3 (fix 1), by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 1000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 128 K
Physical memory used : ~ 7769 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Wed Aug 23 11:58:12 2006
End : Wed Aug 23 11:58:16 2006
Duration : 4.36 seconds
============================================================
Total computation time : 4.36 seconds (~ 0.00 hours)
============================================================
 

Some1ne

Senior member
Apr 21, 2005
862
0
0
bull (if your desktop link is accurate)

You're correct, in that my desktop link is no longer accurate. 1.25 seconds is from my new system, which is an overclocked Core 2 E6600 w/ 2 GB of RAM. I haven't tried it on my old desktop, though with the scaling I've generally seen, it would probably take 2+ seconds on that system.
 

Kango2020

Member
Aug 6, 2006
35
0
0
Computation run information :

Start : Wed Aug 23 15:16:21 2006
End : Wed Aug 23 15:16:22 2006
Duration : 1.38 seconds
 

Toadster

Senior member
Nov 21, 1999
598
0
76
scoop.intel.com
Originally posted by: Some1ne
bull (if your desktop link is accurate)

You're correct, in that my desktop link is no longer accurate. 1.25 seconds is from my new system, which is an overclocked Core 2 E6600 w/ 2 GB of RAM. I haven't tried it on my old desktop, though with the scaling I've generally seen, it would probably take 2+ seconds on that system.


whew! i was gonna say, my C2D better not be slower than your old AMD box ;)