• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

pics of 2003 celica, what do you guys think?

U

Uclagamer_99

Platinum Member
here

i like the new taillamps but i dunno about the new front bumper :\

the interior is supposed to be a lot better too, but its hard to tell from pics 🙂
 
I think the Celica has been ugly ever since they changed the design a few years ago. One of the ugliest cars on the road, now, as far as I'm concerned.
 
I wonder if they're going to re-up the rev limiter on the GT-S 4cylinder... fsck that... the car is overpriced anyways...
 
Interesting...

Kind of 300ZX-ish on the side profile, front end looks good, back isn't really changed much...

Still retains the pissed off insect look.

😀

Viper GTS
 
the front bumper is slightly different...and the taillamps in the back too, i guess you gotta look closely...<shrugs> just thought you guys with interest in cars might be interested 🙂
 
The changes are very minor, not enough to make the car look good. Yes, it's supposed to be "sporty", which accounts for the edgy styling, but plenty of sporty and sports cars look WAY better than the Celica.
 
looks pretty much the same. like the 2003 eclipse, they just changed the bumper and taillights. maybe some other small things. i guess i never really liked it but to each their own.
 
I like the look of the slightly older ones better (early/mid 90's) but still it's not nearly as ugly as a damn Spec V...

😀
 
It looks cool. Although the differences are so minute, I don't even see the point of saying its different. Is 2003 supposed to be a redesign year?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top