Pics in sigs

[ThePresence]

I can guarantee that this will be disabled by tommorow afternoon.

 

[Chompman]

Ok anubis, now you got to test if videos work

 

[Anubis]

i doubt it, there is no [vid].....[/vid] tak that i know of

 

[Chompman]

Forgot the code, one sec

 

[sharkeeper]

Now that is just wrong...

Cheers!

 

[dethman]

Originally posted by: sharkeeper
Now that is just wrong...

Cheers!

get that sh!t out of your sig.

 

[Chompman]

Nope, got me if they have a way to do it

Any change of getting a testing forum to test these?

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: sharkeeper
Now that is just wrong...

Cheers!

OH MY GOD! that is wrong!

bwhahahah funny as heck though!

 

[Chompman]

Ok after that laugh from that nice sized pic I am gonna head out for a bit and do some cs or such, too much laughing hurts

Check back to see if we are all banned later

 

[vi edit]

Christ. I'd settle with just the ability to *CHANGE* my sig let alone put a pic in it.

The last revision of the forums made it so that the underscore in my handle was an illegal character. I get an error any time I try to update my profile.

BAH!

 

[Babbles]

Originally posted by: Balt
It really doesn't matter what we think, the issue will be fixed.

The higher-ups feel that such things give the forums an unprofessional appearance.

I could care less about having pics in the sig, however it is laughable to think that they give the forum an 'unprofessional appearance.' With all of the other horseshit that goes on, I would think that pics in the sigs are the least of their worries. This is hardly a professional forum as it is and coupled with the fact that most of these avatars are unprofessional looking, therefore I think professionalism is already out the door.

 

[vi edit]

Originally posted by: Babbles

Originally posted by: Balt
It really doesn't matter what we think, the issue will be fixed.

The higher-ups feel that such things give the forums an unprofessional appearance.

I could care less about having pics in the sig, however it is laughable to think that they give the forum an 'unprofessional appearance.' With all of the other horseshit that goes on, I would think that pics in the sigs are the least of their worries. This is hardly a professional forum as it is and coupled with the fact that most of these avatars are unprofessional looking, therefore I think professionalism is already out the door.

Professionalism might not be the right word. Non-annoying may be. I CAN'T STAND goning to the little riceboy forums with the 1024x768 size fscking sig pics of their ugly as sin piece of sh!t bondo mobiles.

It really screws with the feng shui of the forums.

 

[KingNothing]

Originally posted by: vi_edit

Originally posted by: Babbles

Originally posted by: Balt
It really doesn't matter what we think, the issue will be fixed.

The higher-ups feel that such things give the forums an unprofessional appearance.

I could care less about having pics in the sig, however it is laughable to think that they give the forum an 'unprofessional appearance.' With all of the other horseshit that goes on, I would think that pics in the sigs are the least of their worries. This is hardly a professional forum as it is and coupled with the fact that most of these avatars are unprofessional looking, therefore I think professionalism is already out the door.

Professionalism might not be the right word. Non-annoying may be. I CAN'T STAND goning to the little riceboy forums with the 1024x768 size fscking sig pics of their ugly as sin piece of sh!t bondo mobiles.

It really screws with the feng shui of the forums.

So...why are you going to the little riceboy forums in the first place?

 

[vi edit]

So...why are you going to the little riceboy forums in the first place?

Typically it's when somebody here links a thread with the title "Hahahaha check out this dumbass!"

And then you click....and you are assaulted with sig pics half the size of your screen.

 

[kkeennyy]

Yes. It's in the same vein as any text in sigs. Images and text are equally likely to offend a close minded person. Since you don't have the right to be not-offended you can rely on your option to disable viewing sigs. That way you don't hamper the freedom of expression of someone with whom you do not agree.

If you don't have the bandwidth for a few dozen images you have no business trying to use the web in the first place.

 

[vi edit]

Yes. It's in the same vein as any text in sigs. Images and text are equally likely to offend a close minded person. Since you don't have the right to be not-offended you can rely on your option to disable viewing sigs. That way you don't hamper the freedom of expression of someone with whom you do not agree.

Text in sigs is fine. So long as it's reasonable.

A
























Sig



















Like

















This


















Isn't







































Reasonable!