I'm doing pullups and deadlifts right now, but I don't want my grip to hinder my progress (especially on the latter).
EDIT: Aren't concentric contraction exercises more effective at building strength than isometric?
No, technically the higher the production of force, the greater the hypertrophy and the greater the strength gains. That puts movements in this order: eccentric > isometric > concentric.
Can you explain that a bit more? It seems counter-intuitive to me. To hold 1lb still, you apply exactly 1lb of force (or more properly, exactly the same amount of force as gravity pulls 1lb of mass down with). To move 1lb against gravity, you apply more force and to let it move with gravity, you apply less. So for a given weight, don't you have to apply more force with a concentric movement? Of course you can handle higher weights with eccentric, but applying less force per pound of mass.
You're thinking very much like a gym user and not like a researcher, which is 100% understandable.
No, I'm thinking like a Newtonian physicistI still don't understand the reasoning, but there's not much arguing with actual measurements...
Actually, gloves require more grip.Another thing that can help with grip is not to use gloves. Give it a few weeks and your hands will become use to it. It is worth trying if you haven't already.
Say my grip just about gives out on a 220lb deadlift with regular (double overhand) grip, what should my first gripper be?
Sorry for being obstinate, but no, it's not. The only reason I can do an eccentric pullup with more weight is that I have to apply less force to allow the weight to move down than I have to to move it upwards.
If I do a bodyweight pullup, I'm applying more force on the way up than on the way down. I weigh 65kg so I have to apply about 638 newtons of upwards force to hold myself in place (let's say halfway up). If I want to let myself down, I apply less than 638 newtons and I accelerate downwards. If I want to get up higher, I apply more than 638 newtons and I accelerate upwards.
Now let's say you add 20kg and it now requires 833 newtons to hold me in place. Presumably, I can't apply that much force. I would assume that I can only apply as much upwards force as I could in the bodyweight scenario, let's say about halfway in between, so 735 newtons. That same amount of force would cause concentric movement in the bodyweight scenario but eccentric in the +20kg scenario.
Or is the point that there's something particular about the way a muscle is constructed that means it's capable of applying more force when getting longer?
I always thought isometric and eccentric were better because people have a tendency to cheat on concentric exercises, by means of throwing their weight around, getting help from other muscles, abusing momentum, basically cheating the exercise in any manner to move the weight. Sometimes you don't even realize you are doing it.
I always thought isometric and eccentric were better because people have a tendency to cheat on concentric exercises, by means of throwing their weight around, getting help from other muscles, abusing momentum, basically cheating the exercise in any manner to move the weight. Sometimes you don't even realize you are doing it.