Pickens throws the gaunlet down

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Stoneburner

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: Stoneburner
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery

Have a pleasant evening.

You're such a hack :laugh:

First of all, you might want to note the 2 warnings at the top of that Wiki entry. It is full of crud.

Secondly, you are saying that we relied on knowingly false documents as our reasoning to go in to Iraq, and forged documents alone. All of which is inaccurate, misleading, and the usual bullshit from you.

Wilson is a liar, Plame is a whore, and you're nothing but a little troll who pops up from time to time.

Stoner doesn't care. He'll throw cold water on everyone elses sources but feels it's perfectly OK to use some schlocked up partisan hackery for his own source and insist it's the final truth. Somehow he doesn't believe the same burden of proof and accuracy he that he demands from others applies to himself. It's hilarious to see and it's typical of his trolling idiocy in here.

What's wrong with my source? I'll never understand this childish fascination you have with creating equivalence everywhere. Just because I point out your sources are biased or incorrect does not mean you should try to do the same UNLESS the same circumstances exist. As for this particular claim, it's fairly well known enough that you and pabster should have heard of it. In fact, why don't you confirm it with him SINCE YOU SAY YOU READ HUBRIS. Yes, Hubris discusses the forged niger documents

Another blatant lie from Chicken.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/...q.documents/index.html


This good enough for your standards pabster? Now will you attack the U.S. govt like you do dan rather?

The only thing consistent about you is your stupidity.

My fascination is not with equivalence. My statement was that you constantly whine like a little bitch about the sources those ideologically opposed to you post in here but when it comes to your own questionable sources you act as if it's up to everyone to prove them wrong, questionable or not. What's good for the gander is not good for the goose in your book and that's plainly obvious.

But who really cares, I guess? Keep being the same moronic, toolish troll you've always been in here. It's plain that you aren't going to change your stripes. Skunks don't. But I'll still gladly point out the stripes you seem to bear so proudly.

 

[Stoneburner]

You just contradicted yourself chicken because you are still insisting on equivalence where there is none. And the only explanation for this is sheer stupidity on your part. If i post a wikipedia article, that's questionable, but then i refer to a book and a cnn article, and you both ignore it? You just don't seem to have any idea what a source is, what a primary and secondary source is, and in which way you are referring to a source. YOu criticized me for linking to the washington post when it was an interview with bush. THis was because I had accurately called you an idiot for referring to BUSH and HIS CLOSE FRIEND as VIABLE sources when they were obviously biased. Logic, evidence, impeachment, it all escapes your feeble mind.

Also, my dishonest, retarded friend, HUBRIS and Valerie Plame's book discuss the forged documents. So you obviously knew of them correct? So why don't you explain to pabster what happened, maybe he'll trust you?

Of course you won't because you area fundamentally dishonest and stupid bipedal organism with the integrity of rice paper in a hurricane.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

It's plain to see there's no equivalence, Stoner, at least where you're concerned. The rules you attempt to apply to others somehow do not apply to you. You've already demonstrated that quite clearly in this thread. Trying to BS your way out of now, like you've doing all along in this thread, will get you nowhere.

Why don't you go try to garner some more facts from people's sigs? Seems that's where the majority of what little knowledge you have comes from.

 

[Stoneburner]

Time for you to be more specific. Point out the equivalence instead of making blanket statements. Can you do that old man ? Of course not, too much work for your advanced age.


More importantly, we are discussing the forged niger documents. You say you have read Plame's book and Hubris, so maybe you can confirm to Pabster that those docs were forged? He'll believe you. Care to confirm it?


If you haven't realized yet, your typical tactic of feigning knowledge and then throwing a e-tantrum full of generalities isn't going to work. I'm assuming you think the more you bloat this thread the less chance of people seeing your childish lying that was exposed earlier. So I'll recap the thread.

1. You claim bush wanted to serve in vietnam and offer flimsy evidence in the face of stronger evidence otherwise.
2. YOu still say you read PLame's book before it was released DESPITE SHOWING NO KNOWLEDGE OF IT
3. You insist picken's never changed the terms of his wager despite the fact he clearly has.
4. You insist John Kerry has to release his full military records to disprove picken's charge WITHOUT showing any basis for such a claim
5. You have yet to comment on Rood's article. I must say though, the silence is deafening.


So, no more generalities, get down to the details so we can see if you have a functioning brain.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

YOU are discussing the forged Niger documents and trying to do your best to derail the original subject of this thread because that's just what BDSers like you do. "B...b...but BUSH!"

Do you have any information on whether or not the gigolo is going to pony up the information requested by Pickens? Or do you even realize that's the actual subject of this thread?

 

[her209]

The pwnage of Pabster and TastesLikeChicken is strong in this thread.

 

[Stoneburner]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
YOU are discussing the forged Niger documents and trying to do your best to derail the original subject of this thread because that's just what BDSers like you do. "B...b...but BUSH!"

Do you have any information on whether or not the gigolo is going to pony up the information requested by Pickens? Or do you even realize that's the actual subject of this thread?

Well you just confirmed they were forged. And you still haven't explained why kerry MUST give his military record just because Mr. PIckens changed the terms.

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: her209
The pwnage of Pabster and TastesLikeChicken is strong in this thread.

I'd say this thread is full of trolls and 10 year olds. Of which you appear to be a part of both.

 

[Stoneburner]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: her209
The pwnage of Pabster and TastesLikeChicken is strong in this thread.

I'd say this thread is full of trolls and 10 year olds. Of which you appear to be a part of both.

If the word troll were banned your posting would be cut 80 percent. If trolling were banned also then we'd get the other 20 percent.

 

[her209]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: her209
The pwnage of Pabster and TastesLikeChicken is strong in this thread.

I'd say this thread is full of trolls and 10 year olds. Of which you appear to be a part of both.

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Stoneburner
If the word troll were banned your posting would be cut 80 percent. If trolling were banned also then we'd get the other 20 percent.

So which phase will you disappear in? :laugh: