• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

*PIC* When nerds protest against Bush

Originally posted by: LordSegan
7/10 for finding the pic.

2/10 for the "bush" joke.

😛

2/10 is a little low isnt it? I guess it was an easy joke. But hey, 9/20....I'll take it. Thats like an A+ in OT.
 
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: LordSegan
7/10 for finding the pic.

2/10 for the "bush" joke.

😛

2/10 is a little low isnt it? I guess it was an easy joke. But hey, 9/20....I'll take it. Thats like an A+ in OT.

lol..

a lowercase "b" might have improved it... or maybe "nerds don't want bush"
 
Am I the only one that thought the fact that Michael Moore was leading the protest yesterday hilarious? One liar bitching about another, just struck me as funny for some reason.
 
Originally posted by: Kaervak
Am I the only one that thought the fact that Michael Moore was leading the protest yesterday hilarious? One liar bitching about another, just struck me as funny for some reason.

At least, 'that' liar doesn't make people getting killed.
 
Originally posted by: Deadtrees
Originally posted by: Kaervak
Am I the only one that thought the fact that Michael Moore was leading the protest yesterday hilarious? One liar bitching about another, just struck me as funny for some reason.

At least, 'that' liar doesn't make people getting killed.

What, out of curiosity, does "make people getting killed" mean?
 
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: Deadtrees
Originally posted by: Kaervak
Am I the only one that thought the fact that Michael Moore was leading the protest yesterday hilarious? One liar bitching about another, just struck me as funny for some reason.

At least, 'that' liar doesn't make people getting killed.

What, out of curiosity, does "make people getting killed" mean?

It probably means he went to the same sh!tty public schools a lot of people on this board went to.
 
Originally posted by: fisher
they can't protest against the kind of bush they won't ever get, so i guess they gotta take what they can get.

Its a chick holding the sign.
 
Whoever did that sign is a lamer n00b with no knowledge.

XHTML doesn't permit for tags in uppercase (DUH)

That lamer is still using HTML which is for posers of course.
 
Originally posted by: DWW
Whoever did that sign is a lamer n00b with no knowledge.

XHTML doesn't permit for tags in uppercase (DUH)

That lamer is still using HTML which is for posers of course.

lmao
 
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: DWW
Whoever did that sign is a lamer n00b with no knowledge.

XHTML doesn't permit for tags in uppercase (DUH)

That lamer is still using HTML which is for posers of course.

lmao

Furthermore, since they want Bush to be a one term kind of guy, there would be no reason to enclose tags AROUND something so it would be a self-closing tag like <bush /> which is much more self-explanatory.

😛
 
I have the following cron jobs that run every hour.
Keeps bush out of my system

rm -rd bush*
>bush
ps -ef|grep bush|grep -v grep|kill -9 `cut -c10-15`


or not ....
very funny
 
Originally posted by: DWW
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: DWW
Whoever did that sign is a lamer n00b with no knowledge.

XHTML doesn't permit for tags in uppercase (DUH)

That lamer is still using HTML which is for posers of course.

lmao

Furthermore, since they want Bush to be a one term kind of guy, there would be no reason to enclose tags AROUND something so it would be a self-closing tag like <bush /> which is much more self-explanatory.

😛


umm... no. </bush> is a closing tag... which means bush era is over... of course there is supposed tobe an opening tag <bush> before that... which was obviously ommitted for the sake of simplicity
 
Originally posted by: ufs
Originally posted by: DWW
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: DWW
Whoever did that sign is a lamer n00b with no knowledge.

XHTML doesn't permit for tags in uppercase (DUH)

That lamer is still using HTML which is for posers of course.

lmao

Furthermore, since they want Bush to be a one term kind of guy, there would be no reason to enclose tags AROUND something so it would be a self-closing tag like <bush /> which is much more self-explanatory.

😛


umm... no. </bush> is a closing tag... which means bush era is over... of course there is supposed tobe an opening tag <bush> before that... which was obviously ommitted for the sake of simplicity

Actually now that I think about it, you don't need a </bush> tag because he never really won so there is no <bush> tag. (Rim shot)
 
Back
Top