pic of tree, nothing special...sorry if its not good enough for you

PHiuR

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
9,539
2
76
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I hope photography isn't your dayjob. Erosion caused the soil go down, exposing the roots :p

lol is the pic really that bad?
 

MichaelD

Lifer
Jan 16, 2001
31,528
3
76
I'm scared. It's one of those trees from The Two Towers...it has LEGS, man...it's chasing me, man!!!!! HELP!!!!


Nice pic. :cool:
 
Apr 5, 2000
13,256
1
0
Originally posted by: PHiuR
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I hope photography isn't your dayjob. Erosion caused the soil go down, exposing the roots :p

lol is the pic really that bad?

No it's decent, I was implying that photographers usually take more interesting pictures than trees with the roots exposed ;)
 

Good picture, but sort of random photography style. Try to get a unique angle of the tree...like from the roots up or something.
 

PHiuR

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
9,539
2
76
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
Originally posted by: PHiuR
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I hope photography isn't your dayjob. Erosion caused the soil go down, exposing the roots :p

lol is the pic really that bad?

No it's decent, I was implying that photographers usually take more interesting pictures than trees with the roots exposed ;)

if i shared the pics of what i take regulary id be banned... JK ;)
 

MichaelD

Lifer
Jan 16, 2001
31,528
3
76
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
Originally posted by: PHiuR
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I hope photography isn't your dayjob. Erosion caused the soil go down, exposing the roots :p

lol is the pic really that bad?

No it's decent, I was implying that photographers usually take more interesting pictures than trees with the roots exposed ;)

Hey, we all can't be the Maxim photographer that shot Carmen Electra. I like his pic. It is well...rooted in the fundamentals of basic quality photography.

Allthough I have no idea what those basic things are, I'm sure that his pic qualifies...*approved*
 

PHiuR

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
9,539
2
76
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
Originally posted by: PHiuR
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I hope photography isn't your dayjob. Erosion caused the soil go down, exposing the roots :p

lol is the pic really that bad?

No it's decent, I was implying that photographers usually take more interesting pictures than trees with the roots exposed ;)

Hey, we all can't be the Maxim photographer that shot Carmen Electra. I like his pic. It is well...rooted in the fundamentals of basic quality photography.

Allthough I have no idea what those basic things are, I'm sure that his pic qualifies...*approved*

thank you ::shakes hand::

 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
36
91
Originally posted by: MichaelD
I like his pic. It is well...rooted in the fundamentals of basic quality photography.

Allthough I have no idea what those basic things are, I'm sure that his pic qualifies...*approved*
Well, the pic is certainly more well-rooted than the tree. :)

ZV
 

IBuyUFO

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,717
0
76
the pic has too much going on in the background. Sometimes simplicity can work wonder and don't forget the rule of third. Makes things a whole lot interesting.
 

MichaelD

Lifer
Jan 16, 2001
31,528
3
76
Originally posted by: IBuyUFO
the pic has too much going on in the background. Sometimes simplicity can work wonder and don't forget the rule of third. Makes things a whole lot interesting.

Third? Who's on first?

Heh, I think I'm funny, tonight. ;)

Now that you mention it; I agree. The tree should be the center of the attention with not much else visible in the frame. you're correct.

Still a cool pic though.

Makes me think of Ansel Adams for some reason...it would be cool in B&W.
 

JeffSpicoli

Senior member
Jan 10, 2002
489
0
0
Hey, we all can't be the Maxim photographer that shot Carmen Electra. I like his pic. It is well...rooted in the fundamentals of basic quality photography.

Allthough I have no idea what those basic things are, I'm sure that his pic qualifies...*approved*

:camera:'s?
 

Cyberian

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2000
9,999
1
0
Originally posted by: IBuyUFO
the pic has too much going on in the background. Sometimes simplicity can work wonder and don't forget the rule of third. Makes things a whole lot interesting.
Rule of third??
I am totally new to still photography.

Thanks!!

 

Chrono310

Member
Apr 25, 2003
45
0
0
Originally posted by: Cyberian
Originally posted by: IBuyUFO
the pic has too much going on in the background. Sometimes simplicity can work wonder and don't forget the rule of third. Makes things a whole lot interesting.
Rule of third??
I am totally new to still photography.

Thanks!!

It's just some photography jargon having to do with subject placement within the picture.
http://www.ruleofthirds.com/what.html
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
36
91
Originally posted by: Cyberian
Originally posted by: IBuyUFO
the pic has too much going on in the background. Sometimes simplicity can work wonder and don't forget the rule of third. Makes things a whole lot interesting.
Rule of third??
I am totally new to still photography.

Thanks!!
Yup, the "rule of thirds", basically it's just that you shouldn't ever split a picture right down the middle. For example, if you're taking a picture of the horizon, then the picture should be 1/3 earth and 2/3 sky or vice versa, but it should not be 1/2 and 1/2. Also, you're generally not supposed to center the object.

One of my favourite photographs. I took it at an overlook near my home in Ohio with a Contax 139 Quartz and a 55mm Zeiss lens.

ZV