Physics question: fuzzy dice in a car/plane

Bkas

Member
Jul 24, 2002
124
0
0
When a plane/car starts to accelerate on ground, and you take mass (say, fuzzy dice) and hang it, why does it hang backwards? Shouldn't it still point straight down (gravity) relative to everything?
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,855
73
91
If at a constant speed, they would hang straight down. It's the fact of acceleration that causes the swing backward.

JC
 

geno

Lifer
Dec 26, 1999
25,074
4
0
The same reason you get pressed back into your seat during acceleration, when acceleration stops (motion = constant), they'll point straight down, as you won't feel squished into the seat anymore :)
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
When everything has returned to equilibrium (ie you're moving at a constant speed) it will hang straight down once more.

Until then, you're accelerating an object that is not rigidly suspended. Like any object with mass, it resists change in momentum. Hence it doesn't hang straight.

It's exactly the same reason your head gets snapped back by a powerful car.

Viper GTS
 

WinkOsmosis

Banned
Sep 18, 2002
13,990
1
0
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
When everything has returned to equilibrium (ie you're moving at a constant speed) it will hang straight down once more.

Until then, you're accelerating an object that is not rigidly suspended. Like any object with mass, it resists change in momentum. Hence it doesn't hang straight.

It's exactly the same reason your head gets snapped back by a powerful car.

Viper GTS
No! Your head is snapped back by surge, change in acceleration. At constant acceleration, there is no head snapping.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,815
6,778
126
Gravity and acceleration are indistinguishible. When both are present, operating in different vectors, the string points along the combined vector.
 

NogginBoink

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
5,322
0
0
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
When everything has returned to equilibrium (ie you're moving at a constant speed) it will hang straight down once more.

Until then, you're accelerating an object that is not rigidly suspended. Like any object with mass, it resists change in momentum. Hence it doesn't hang straight.

It's exactly the same reason your head gets snapped back by a powerful car.

Viper GTS
No! Your head is snapped back by surge, change in acceleration. At constant acceleration, there is no head snapping.

Sure there is. Well, it might not be a "snap," but with constant accelleration, you'll be pressed into the seat.
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
When everything has returned to equilibrium (ie you're moving at a constant speed) it will hang straight down once more.

Until then, you're accelerating an object that is not rigidly suspended. Like any object with mass, it resists change in momentum. Hence it doesn't hang straight.

It's exactly the same reason your head gets snapped back by a powerful car.

Viper GTS
No! Your head is snapped back by surge, change in acceleration. At constant acceleration, there is no head snapping.

rolleye.gif


Your head is under constant force under constant acceleration, it only stays upright because:

1) Your neck is much more rigid than a string
2) You have the ability to control it

The principles are exactly the same.

Viper GTS
 

Bkas

Member
Jul 24, 2002
124
0
0
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
When everything has returned to equilibrium (ie you're moving at a constant speed) it will hang straight down once more.

Until then, you're accelerating an object that is not rigidly suspended. Like any object with mass, it resists change in momentum. Hence it doesn't hang straight.

It's exactly the same reason your head gets snapped back by a powerful car.

Viper GTS

So it's like a "centrifugal force"?

Why wouldn't it hang forward, then? Go with the car/plane? Can soemone explain this in terms of force equations (like you did back in high school physics)? I'm just curious.

 

Bkas

Member
Jul 24, 2002
124
0
0
Originally posted by: no0b
centrifugal force?!?!

you must mean centripital force...

No, I don't mean centripetal force. I mean centrifugal. Look it up.

Actually, the entire body is not relaly rotating, so I can't call it centrifugal. I take it back.


 

beer

Lifer
Jun 27, 2000
11,169
1
0
Originally posted by: no0b
centrifugal force?!?!

you must mean centripital force...

Centrifugal force is an imaginary force that doesn't really exist :)

Centripital force is the force vector pointing inwards in any uniform circular motion.
 

WinkOsmosis

Banned
Sep 18, 2002
13,990
1
0
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
When everything has returned to equilibrium (ie you're moving at a constant speed) it will hang straight down once more.

Until then, you're accelerating an object that is not rigidly suspended. Like any object with mass, it resists change in momentum. Hence it doesn't hang straight.

It's exactly the same reason your head gets snapped back by a powerful car.

Viper GTS
No! Your head is snapped back by surge, change in acceleration. At constant acceleration, there is no head snapping.

rolleye.gif


Your head is under constant force under constant acceleration, it only stays upright because:

1) Your neck is much more rigid than a string
2) You have the ability to control it

The principles are exactly the same.

Viper GTS
I realize your head is pushed back.. I THOUGHT that was a given. That is what I was saying. When there is alot of surge, you can't react quickly enough to prevent your head from snapping back.
Why do I have to spell everything out? "

Your head is snapped back by surge, change in acceleration.
Where did I say anything about there NOT being a force on your head under constant acceleration?

Constant acceleration means your muscles have to exert a constant force. It's just like if you were leaning and your neck muscles were keeping your head upright. Neck snapping because of surge is like tilting your head sideways and jumping. There are changes in acceleration. It is NOT the same principle.
 

no0b

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2001
3,804
1
0
Originally posted by: Elemental007
Originally posted by: no0b
centrifugal force?!?!

you must mean centripital force...

Centrifugal force is an imaginary force that doesn't really exist :)

Centripital force is the force vector pointing inwards in any uniform circular motion.

yea thats what I was thinking...
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,855
73
91
Originally posted by: Elemental007
Originally posted by: no0b
centrifugal force?!?!

you must mean centripital force...

Centrifugal force is an imaginary force that doesn't really exist :)

Centripital force is the force vector pointing inwards in any uniform circular motion.

Doesn't centripetal acceleration point outwards? The force tries to push things out from the center, yes?

 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
There are some seriously misguided people here.

Centripetal
Centrifugal

And Jellomancer, it is exactly the same principle. Yes, we can hold our heads still. And yes, a sudden or severe change in acceleration will cause us to lose control.

We are not, however, talking about reaction time our our own muscle strength. We are simply considering the tendency of an object to resist changes in momentum. I was relating it to something he probably feels every day.

Viper GTS
 

amnesiac

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
15,781
1
71
Originally posted by: Bkas
When a plane/car starts to accelerate on ground, and you take mass (say, fuzzy dice) and hang it, why does it hang backwards? Shouldn't it still point straight down (gravity) relative to everything?

No, you're absolutely right. There must be a bug in the physics logic.
I submitted a problem ticket to the techs, and they said they'll get right on it.
 

beer

Lifer
Jun 27, 2000
11,169
1
0
Originally posted by: JC
Originally posted by: Elemental007
Originally posted by: no0b
centrifugal force?!?!

you must mean centripital force...

Centrifugal force is an imaginary force that doesn't really exist :)

Centripital force is the force vector pointing inwards in any uniform circular motion.

Doesn't centripetal acceleration point outwards? The force tries to push things out from the center, yes?

No.

Without trying to explain basic, fundamental dynamics:

SparkNotes.