sciencewhiz
Diamond Member
But that's not the radius that the mass rotates, which is what counts.
EDIT: It's not a 2.5 kg mass at the end of a weightless rod, which is what you are calculating, but a uniform 2.5 kg rod.
-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Physics Help please!
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
But that's not the radius that the mass rotates, which is what counts.
EDIT: It's not a 2.5 kg mass at the end of a weightless rod, which is what you are calculating, but a uniform 2.5 kg rod.
blahblah99
Platinum Member
Here, give me your # and I'll walk you through it...
Goosemaster
Lifer
wow..you people are desperate
Meh, Guild Wars WPE ended yesterday, Conan is a rerun, and I'm bored out of my mind having just dropped the only class that was actually hard this semester. Besides, if I really cared about pix, my first post would have been 70nm, 4.54*10^-11m pix? 😛. Anyways, I should go do my own EE homework now.
sciencewhiz
Diamond Member
In some ways I was thinking about the problem wrong. However, element is still wrong. I got the same answer as fawhfe
I'd love to see element's equations. (PM if you don't want to give the solution away)
I'd love to see element's equations. (PM if you don't want to give the solution away)
George P Burdell
Lifer
TheLonelyPhoenix
Diamond Member
So levers, pulleys, and other simple machines that people have used to lift hundreds of times their weight were all useless because they were still lifting the same weight?
j00 fail teh physics.
The moment of inertia is greater when the weight is farther away from the fulcrum.
Chaotic42
Lifer
Afro000Dude
Senior member
It's rev/s not m/s.
sciencewhiz
Diamond Member
T=J*alpha
T=1/3*m*l^2*alpha
alpha=3*2*pi/.19 (convert to radians/sec)
T=1/3*2.5*.92^2*3*2*pi/.19
T=70 Nm
J=1/3*m*l^2 is the rotational inertia of a Rod of length L and mass m spun from an end.
If it was spun from the center it would be 1/12*m*l^2
T=1/3*m*l^2*alpha
alpha=3*2*pi/.19 (convert to radians/sec)
T=1/3*2.5*.92^2*3*2*pi/.19
T=70 Nm
J=1/3*m*l^2 is the rotational inertia of a Rod of length L and mass m spun from an end.
If it was spun from the center it would be 1/12*m*l^2
So much for not explicitly spelling it out. Oh well, we better get pix now. 😀
Seriously though, to OP: I would strongly recommend doing some more of these problems. These are really basic applications of the equations and if you're having trouble with them, its only going to get worse--either the problems will get harder or you'll run out of time on exams, because the prof will expect people to be able to do them quickly.
Prob number one
I guess we pretty much establish that its force times distance. Distance is .92m
============
^
|
|
|
If you apply pressure here its kinda tricky to solve, there is an easy way to solve it. key is energy used is energy regardless if what form u use. Lets say you move rotate the tip of that bar 1 inch. How does that compare say instead of rotating it you push it down the center x amount of distance? Will, if you push it down the center without rotating, then the total area your bar cover is X distance times .92 meters right? But if you push the tip and let bar rotate, then the area you moved is the cross section that the entire bar displace. SO knowing that, here's way to figure it out.
3.0revs/.19 seconds = 1 rev / .0633333 sec,
So basically, you've covered the area of the circle in .063333333 seconds, thus you displaced the bar an area of Pi * R^2 meter (2.659 m^2) in .06333 seconds. Now suppose you don't rotate and instead push the center of the bar in a straight line in .063333 seconds with the same force. Since you expand the same amont of energy, you should in theory displace the bar the same amount of area right? Lets call X the distance you push the bar from the center. X times the length of the bar would be the total area you displace in .063333 seconds and should be = 2.659m^2. so X in meters = (2.659m^2./.92m)
This yield x = 2.89 meters. So pushing the Rod around in a circle once in .19 seconds is equal to pushing it down the center in a straight line of 2.89 meters in .19 seconds. But it's much easier to calculate things in a straight line. Our force is then merely the mass times acceleration..
Mass = 2.5Kg
Acceleration = 2.89m/.19 s^2 = 15.2m/s ^2
Ok, now you have mass, you have acceleration, and you have distance 😀
so .92m * 2.5Kg * 15.2m/ss = 34.96 I hope i'm right
Mine is a total cheap way of solving it. Instead of treating it as a rotating rod, convert it into something u push in a straight line right down the center.
I guess we pretty much establish that its force times distance. Distance is .92m
============
^
|
|
|
If you apply pressure here its kinda tricky to solve, there is an easy way to solve it. key is energy used is energy regardless if what form u use. Lets say you move rotate the tip of that bar 1 inch. How does that compare say instead of rotating it you push it down the center x amount of distance? Will, if you push it down the center without rotating, then the total area your bar cover is X distance times .92 meters right? But if you push the tip and let bar rotate, then the area you moved is the cross section that the entire bar displace. SO knowing that, here's way to figure it out.
3.0revs/.19 seconds = 1 rev / .0633333 sec,
So basically, you've covered the area of the circle in .063333333 seconds, thus you displaced the bar an area of Pi * R^2 meter (2.659 m^2) in .06333 seconds. Now suppose you don't rotate and instead push the center of the bar in a straight line in .063333 seconds with the same force. Since you expand the same amont of energy, you should in theory displace the bar the same amount of area right? Lets call X the distance you push the bar from the center. X times the length of the bar would be the total area you displace in .063333 seconds and should be = 2.659m^2. so X in meters = (2.659m^2./.92m)
This yield x = 2.89 meters. So pushing the Rod around in a circle once in .19 seconds is equal to pushing it down the center in a straight line of 2.89 meters in .19 seconds. But it's much easier to calculate things in a straight line. Our force is then merely the mass times acceleration..
Mass = 2.5Kg
Acceleration = 2.89m/.19 s^2 = 15.2m/s ^2
Ok, now you have mass, you have acceleration, and you have distance 😀
so .92m * 2.5Kg * 15.2m/ss = 34.96 I hope i'm right
Mine is a total cheap way of solving it. Instead of treating it as a rotating rod, convert it into something u push in a straight line right down the center.
sciencewhiz
Diamond Member
It's not as simple as saying "yeah that's what I meant" You explicitly need to convert rev/s to m/s if you want to try to do it your way.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
