Physicians vs Gun Owners

[jjones]

Originally posted by: iamwiz82

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...rc&highlight_key=y

WTF??

WTF indeed. Just trolling in this thread I guess.

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: jjones

Originally posted by: iamwiz82

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...rc&highlight_key=y

WTF??

WTF indeed. Just trolling in this thread I guess.

I just wanted to try out the other side of the argument for a change and see what people would say.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: iamwiz82

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Uses for a gun:
Self protection
Sport shooting
Controlled hunting (ban hunting, and usually things are worse off for the animals)
Collecting for aesthetic value (much like cars)
Collecting for historical value (much like cars)

Guns are for self-prtection as you are likely to hurt/kill innocent people.

Hunting is a barbaric sport that is no longer required.

Collecting guns has to be the most childish hobby in the would. I mean, what would you do with them?

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...rc&highlight_key=y

WTF??

well wonder what is the truth? he must either have bad security in the fact htat someone took controle of his computer or a lier.

I wondered who would bust me out first.
:laugh:

God i figured you were trolling. Didnt think someone could be so fricken stupid. hope you had fun?


/me shoots him in the foot.

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: K1052
If there were no guns there would be no gun deaths.

Are all women prostitutes? They are equiped to be one... If there were no women, there would be no prostitution.

OK, that's a bit overboard, right?

If you kill everyone with AIDS, it won't exist either. Kill the patient to get rid of the disease. That overboard too?

Guns are only meant to kill. There is no reasonable need for firearms in a modern society. The police get paid for a reason.

Right, you have no concept of an armed society and it's affects on government. Please research the second admendment, it's not for hunting.

How is an oppressed society supposed to combat it's government w/o weapons? Government is inherently dangerous.

The 2nd Amendment is outdated. Where do you draw the line? Nuclear weapons,biotoxins, chemical shells?

You really think the government is going to try anything? We have moved on to more civil times.

The line was drawn a LONG TIME AGO. Back then they had: muskets, canons, explosives. However, they only protected firearms which basically rifles and pistols. Military grade weapons existed, and they (writers of the constitution) didn't feel it was necessary to include military level weapons.

Why? Because when nearly everyone owns simple firearms, no army could take them. No matter what military weapons are used. Can you imagine trying to invade the southern USA? NOT GONNA HAPPEN, shy of nukes. The US military is NO MATCH for it's armed populce, no gov't military can take out their own people, unless you disarm them first.

WAH, they can still nuke us!!! OK, do you really think the government will nuke it's entire country? Who/what would be left to govern? No, they wouldn't. They would still have to go "door to door."

 

[Hecubus2000]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: K1052
If there were no guns there would be no gun deaths.

Are all women prostitutes? They are equiped to be one... If there were no women, there would be no prostitution.

OK, that's a bit overboard, right?

If you kill everyone with AIDS, it won't exist either. Kill the patient to get rid of the disease. That overboard too?

Guns are only meant to kill. There is no reasonable need for firearms in a modern society. The police get paid for a reason.

Right, you have no concept of an armed society and it's affects on government. Please research the second admendment, it's not for hunting.

How is an oppressed society supposed to combat it's government w/o weapons? Government is inherently dangerous.

The 2nd Amendment is outdated. Where do you draw the line? Nuclear weapons,biotoxins, chemical shells?

You really think the government is going to try anything? We have moved on to more civil times.

Take a history class.

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: iamwiz82

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Uses for a gun:
Self protection
Sport shooting
Controlled hunting (ban hunting, and usually things are worse off for the animals)
Collecting for aesthetic value (much like cars)
Collecting for historical value (much like cars)

Guns are for self-prtection as you are likely to hurt/kill innocent people.

Hunting is a barbaric sport that is no longer required.

Collecting guns has to be the most childish hobby in the would. I mean, what would you do with them?

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...rc&highlight_key=y

WTF??

well wonder what is the truth? he must either have bad security in the fact htat someone took controle of his computer or a lier.

I wondered who would bust me out first.
:laugh:

God i figured you were trolling. Didnt think someone could be so fricken stupid. hope you had fun?


/me shoots him in the foot.

I have defended the rights of gun owners in many a thread.

I offer my apologies to any offended by my temporary defection.

Edit: for my typing skillz

 

[shenaniganz]

Nice. You really had me riled for awhile.

:beer:

 

[jjones]

Originally posted by: K1052

I have defended the rights of gin owners in many a thread.

I offer my apologies to any offended by my temporary defection.

Yeah, okay, so you're cool with gin owners, but what about gun owners ya tard?

:beer::beer:

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: jjones

Originally posted by: K1052

I have defended the rights of gin owners in many a thread.

I offer my apologies to any offended by my temporary defection.

Yeah, okay, so you're cool with gin owners, but what about gun owners ya tard?

:beer::beer:

I just edited. I know I suck at typing.

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: K1052I have defended the rights of gun owners in many a thread.

I offer my apologies to any offended by my temporary defection.

Edit: for my typing skillz

Nothing wrong with playing devils advocate.

 

[yllus]

If anyone brings up the point about the Constitution only mentioning rifles, please refer them to the fact that pretty much all small arms were called rifles back then. On account of the rifling of the barrel as opposed to smooth bore.

*goes back to studying*

 

[edro]

Awesome stats..

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: MrChad
Thanks for the informative flamebait.