Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: DBL
get at least 24mm for the wide end and preferably 17mm. 28mm is not wide enough on a 1.6x DSLR.
Again I'm a total noob here. Wide end, does that equate to a widescreen picture or something?
Originally posted by: Kaido
Would this bag fit the Rebel with a Tamron lens?
http://www.ebags.com/case_logic/slr_cam...product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=57076
Edit: Actually, I'd probably want this one:
http://www.ebags.com/case_logic/slr_zoo...product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=57077
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I would get a nice padded strap though. The one the camera comes with is not very comfortable after about an hour with the camera hanging around your neck.
Originally posted by: DBL
Originally posted by: Kaido
Would this bag fit the Rebel with a Tamron lens?
http://www.ebags.com/case_logic/slr_cam...product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=57076
Edit: Actually, I'd probably want this one:
http://www.ebags.com/case_logic/slr_zoo...product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=57077
probably should be fine. You realize that lens is relatively heavy?
Originally posted by: thirdeye
Here is a nice back pack I have for mine.
Here is a link to the lens.
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I would get a nice padded strap though. The one the camera comes with is not very comfortable after about an hour with the camera hanging around your neck.
Any particular strap you'd recommend? I'm poking around B&H and Amazon right now.
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: Kaido
Also, is there a good lens tutorial? I have no idea what the XXmm and fX.X stuff means :Q
XXmm is the zoom, and the f/X.X is the aperture (how much light is let in)
For example, a 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 lens can zoom from 50 to 200mm, and it's aperture at the wide end is f/2.8 and at the long end it's f/3.5.
Zoom as in how far away it can zoom in on stuff?
Originally posted by: torpid
If she will be doing a lot of indoor photography the $70 50mm 1.8 lens is a must have. It has no zoom level so it means moving around to set up your shot but the speed for that price is really a must. I hate taking photos with flash so I have that lens on my camera all the time now. Someone above recommended the 1.4 50mm but that is insanely expensive and won't fit the budget.
Edit: that would be in addition to the tamron or whatever zoom you get.
Originally posted by: dowxp
I would suggest the 28-135 IS ; http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revi...35mm-f-3.5-5.6-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
Also the rebel doesn't take advantage of WA cards, so extreme II or even regular CF cards write at the same speeds (there was a review over this)
a nice tripod (bogen, gitzo) + ball head release grip? depends what she wants to do. maybe a lowepro case ... A second battery is recommended.
Originally posted by: mobobuff
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: Kaido
Also, is there a good lens tutorial? I have no idea what the XXmm and fX.X stuff means :Q
XXmm is the zoom, and the f/X.X is the aperture (how much light is let in)
For example, a 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 lens can zoom from 50 to 200mm, and it's aperture at the wide end is f/2.8 and at the long end it's f/3.5.
Zoom as in how far away it can zoom in on stuff?
Yeah, but the mm measurement doesn't give you an exact translation of magnification power. That measurement is the distance between the point where the light leaves the lens and the plane of the image sensor (I think, it's been a while since I sat a photography class). The farther away that point is from the image sensor, the wider the projection onto the image sensor, hence the magnification... I think. If you had a 50-200mm lens, and you zoomed in as close as possible... I'd say that's approximately an 8x optical magnification. Something like a 75-300mm lens, would give a maximum of approximately 12x optical magnification.
A good pair of lenses to have would be something like a 28-90mm and a 75-300mm.
The best thing would be to browse over some DSLR camera tutorials.
Originally posted by: Kaido
Is this the 50mm lens everyone is talking about?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control...ku=12142&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Kaido
Is this the 50mm lens everyone is talking about?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control...ku=12142&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
That's the one.
For $289 I think this lens is a better value (when you consider quality/price).
My .02
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
1000 bucks... let's see
18-50 sigma lens (300-400 bucks)
rebel XT body (down to 500 now??)
Canon backpack (30 bucks)
Skip the extra battery, you won't need it. A battery grip would be nice though ($200)
I have the canon 17-85mm IS USM, pretty useful focal range but can't say that i'm completely satisfied with it.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: dowxp
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: NutBucket
a real flash
Agreed. And it will help with fast shooting just make sure you get some rechargeable batteries for it. The on camera flash is useless if you stick a big honking lens on the camera.
I would add that the 50mm f/1.4 lens is a great portrait lens.
Unless she's shooting for hours at a time she won't need an extra battery or the battery grip. I've carried my 300D all day on one battery many times and for hundreds of shots. Just don't use the LCD to view the pictures a lot and it will last a long long time. The battery grip is nice if you have large hands but otherwise it's just extra weight.
I would get a nice padded strap though. The one the camera comes with is not very comfortable after about an hour with the camera hanging around your neck.
Excellent, thanks! What flash stuff would you recommend? I'm used to my little Canon A75, which doesn't really take any fun accessories aside from small lens improvements![]()
420EX ?
That's what I have but I bought that flash for my Elan 7E which supports the E-TTL. I don't think the Rebel XT has this feature though. Still, it is better than the on camera flash. I can fire off 3 shots with the flash in about 2 seconds on my 300D with rechargeable batteries in the flash and it recovers much quicker than the on camera flash too.
It's kind of a moot point though if all her shooting will be outside in broad daylight. What kind of shooting will she be doing with the camera?
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Kaido
Is this the 50mm lens everyone is talking about?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control...ku=12142&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
That's the one.
For $289 I think this lens is a better value (when you consider quality/price).
My .02
What does 1.4 vs. 1.8 do?
Originally posted by: montanafan
Kaido, it would help a great deal to know what sort of photos or what sort of conditions she plans to shoot most often in order to know what sort of lens(es) would be best and whether or not a flash, etc. would be necessary right away.
Is she going to be shooting indoors or outdoors most often? Sports, portraits, or landscapes, etc.?
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
1000 bucks... let's see
18-50 sigma lens (300-400 bucks)
rebel XT body (down to 500 now??)
Canon backpack (30 bucks)
Skip the extra battery, you won't need it. A battery grip would be nice though ($200)
I have the canon 17-85mm IS USM, pretty useful focal range but can't say that i'm completely satisfied with it.
The Tamron is 28-75mm and the Canon is 50mm...is it worth getting both for a beginner dSLR setup?
