Originally posted by: Descartes
You haven't provided enough information. First, you'd have to quantify difficult. Difficult how? In terms of time? Physical/mental exertion? Monetary resources? What's the value for each task? Obviously, that which has the greatest value for the least effort is likely the winner, but even that doesn't consider all the ancillary details: time constraints, whether it's part of a greater goal that has a greater value than the other tasks, etc.
So, I think it's a bad question. Personally, I evaluate all facets of an action and take that which gives me the greater return [mostly] independent of effort. That which has the greatest return is usually that which is in agreement with long-term goals and that which challenges my current intellectual foundation as much as possible.
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: DaShen
Depends... which one is more crucial/important?
Not an issue. If you want a context, imagine you are working on a house and have two items you need to complete. Something like ripping out four layers of tile in one room and painting a small room in another part of the house. Both must be done, but they are vastly different in difficulty. 🙂
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Personally, I would delegate both.
Originally posted by: sandorski
depends
Originally posted by: kt
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Personally, I would delegate both.
You have upper management written all over you.
Originally posted by: dullard
Your advantage there was you made the hard job easier (digging when it was cool). Your advantage was NOT because you did the hard job first. For example, pretend instead, you worked from 2 pm - 10 pm. Would you do the digging in the heat of the day at 2 pm? Or would you have rather waited until 6 pm when it was cooler?Originally posted by: funboy42
I used to work on the R&R. I would do all my trench digging during the day when it was a bit cooler out and I was full of energy then run my wires and fill it in. Rather then some of the others that would run thier wires and hook them up then in the middle of the afternoon when your hot, sweaty, and tired already then go digging (by hand mind you because the RR I worked for didnt like to have machinery on the right of way). I always got all my hard stuff done and out of the way and when it was raining (without thunder and lightning for you can get electicuted if it hits the rail even from miles away) I worked and got my shoveling and pic axing done no matter what first thing.
So your choice was medium first then easy second. That isn't the question. The question was hard/easy vs easy/hard, not medium/easy vs easy/hard.
😀Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Originally posted by: kt
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Personally, I would delegate both.
You have upper management written all over you.
I was in upper management at one time, but it didn't work out.
They locked me out of the boardroom when they found out my parents were married.
Originally posted by: fitzov
are you talking prudence or morality?
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: AndrewR
No idea why I thought of this a little while ago, but I wanted to see what the opinions were on here.
So, if you have two tasks or jobs (unrelated to each other so it doesn't matter what order they are done), which do you do first: the difficult one, or the easy one? Do you go for the quick "win" and knock out the easy one, or do you use your best (first) efforts on the difficult task and leave the easy one for later?
A poll for your enjoyment!
More of a psychology thing than philosophy don't you think?