I was just musing how much effort is wasted in the world by these kinds of manuvers: Intel puts inferior pads on the HSs to reduce the likelihood of successful overclocking. This raises the production costs, and prices, of the retail product. Then we scrape it off and apply a different substance.
BTW, even if true, this would only apply to CPU manufacturers' products. Any other HSF manufacturer would have no motive to put something that's worse than RS paste on the HS, they should either be at least as good as RS, or put nothing and tell the buyer to use their own.
Or is the alternative _nothing_, and the OEM pad better than nothing?
JesseKnows