>>>The way I know him he's very much anti competition,
>>>anti warfare, anti the army (he refused to join
>>>when they wanted him to) and so it doesn't surprise me
>>>to see him mocking those who 'like the competition'.
I think (and hope
) that's were you made the mistake. First you tell us he likes to play with us so we'll fight harder.
Then you dicede to tell us about how he hates it when there's a conpetition or fight.
_AND_ you tell us some stuff I personally think is a little too much...
>>>You must understand that this is one unpredictable individual, as
>>>far as I know him. He's the kind that lives in computer-rooms, has
>>>no wife or girlfriend and always wears sneakers at work.
>>>He doesn't like team-sports, he's a loner and he absolutely likes
>>>to somewhat control people's behavior which causes him to be in
>>>his profession, he rules over 2 large networks (where I know of,
>>>there could be more..).
>>>His views on life are realistic and nihilistic, he strongly
>>>believes there's no point to life and things like that...
>>>So, as I've mentioned:
>>>His character fits the profile of that of someone who would be
>>>doing something like this.
What you're trying to do is give us the feeling that you're really sure (you _could_ be, but I don't think so. Sorry)
You do this by giving us some extra info on his character and what kind of person he is. What I think is strange is that
1. You use the same nick as one of the administrators of tweakers.net
2. You give us the info, but it doesn't all add-up
3. Some of use get the feeling this is a game for you and you are trying to fool around with us. (E.g. you don't know a thing and you have a nice story.)
In your advantage:
1. Nice story
2. No dist.net guys have turned up here (where are you?)
3. Character matches somewhat
I'll write a mail to one of the dist.net guys I know (a little), just to get his words out on this.
Itsme! out, I just get annoyed by the thought you're a fake.
(I've been looking at the site for about an hour-and-a-half. What strikes me is that the english you use is very different, the tonation is different I mean. On your site you seem to not care what others say, do and think, while here you're very different. I alomst can't describe it, I'll do it in Dutch first, then I'll translate it for you guys. (And you van always use the translators if you don't trust me.
Je zit in een soort schuld-positie, en het is net of wij je allemaal
aanvallen, dit is waarschijnlijk ook waarom je engelse taalgebruik
heel anders is. Ik heb sterk het idee dat de helft van wat je doet een facade is. De links die het meest interessant zijn werken niet (op je site), helaas is het ook _nogal_ rommelig opgezet, wat het plezier niet bevorderd. (Wel een mooie intro trouwens, compliment!)
You're in a position were you are blamed, and you try to keep your head above the water. This is problably why your english language is different I guess. IMHO half of what you do is facade, the most interesting links on you page aren't working and the site is _quite_ a mess. (No logic mapping used) This makes it less nice to sort of wander around on the site. (You do have a nice intro though!, my compliments fot that!)
I dunno, still sceptical, sorry. And I know I _can_ be wrong.
/me out
Facebook
Twitter