Did you watch the same video I did? he was in the same area as everyone else and the old bag started the entire incident "I deny you the right to tape her ass", again I'm not denying the dude was creepy but if the self-rightous types just let him be nothing would have happened, you just aggravated that THE LAW PERMITS HIM TO USE HIS CAMERA AND YOU DON'T LIKE IT, TOUGH SHIT, STAY INDOORS IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT...
Did you watch the same video I did? he was in the same area as everyone else and the old bag started the entire incident "I deny you the right to tape her ass", again I'm not denying the dude was creepy but if the self-rightous types just let him be nothing would have happened, you just aggravated that THE LAW PERMITS HIM TO USE HIS CAMERA AND YOU DON'T LIKE IT, TOUGH SHIT, STAY INDOORS IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT...
eits
Lifer
only a professional pervert would know that shit without shame of expressing it in public while doing the shameful act.
moshquerade
No Lifer
- Nov 1, 2001
- 61,504
- 12
- 56
I said, "he knew by his actions alone that he would get someone to speak up against him."
You understand that statement, right? I didn't say he was the first to speak, but he sure escalated the whole scene with the idiotic bullcrap he spewed. And don't think he's just an innocent bystander with a little camera he has a right to point at whatever he wants. HE WANTED TO GET A REACTION! HE IS NOT TAKING A VID FOR HIS ENJOYMENT ALONE. (Which would still be creepy). He is taking it for the likes of the Howard Stern Show. Do you get that?
NO ONE HAS SAID HE DIDN'T HAVE "THE RIGHT" TO TAPE HER. Get that through your skull. I am saying he a low life scum bucket trying to profit off any situation where he can make a scene.
Here's the guy behind the camera, Joey Boots, described as "pulling off on air pranks for a laugh." He does this sh#t for a living.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BZ7BEOnkfU
More of his "videos"
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=joey+boots&aq=f
lupi
Lifer
- Apr 8, 2001
- 32,539
- 260
- 126
BoberFett
Lifer
- Oct 9, 1999
- 37,562
- 9
- 81
That's funny, the chiropractic quack telling others they have no shame. If you had any shame you'd stop robbing people of money they could otherwise use for real medical treatment.
Unprovoked, unwarranted and unacceptable.
Admin allisolm
Last edited by a moderator:
eits
Lifer
what's even funnier is when a person who doesn't know anything about someone makes assumptions about them.
moshquerade
No Lifer
- Nov 1, 2001
- 61,504
- 12
- 56
when you have to explain something ten times you start to reach the breaking point.
Last edited:
moshquerade
No Lifer
- Nov 1, 2001
- 61,504
- 12
- 56
I guess we agree to disagree then, I don't see someone standing with a camera, not making a scene as trying to elicit any response, he did not walk up 3 feet away from her ass nor did he say a god damm word, if just the sight of someone taping a girl is "eliciting a response" then there are too many oversensitive whiny pussies in the world, if he had been a 22 year old hot-looking man taping not a damm word would have been said but wait, he's older fat, and unattractive so he's a "creep", well tough crap princess, stay home so you can surround yourself with young , cute sensitive men who never use a camera..
Here's the thing - it's the middle of Times Square. It is insane to expect privacy in the middle of Times Square. It is retarded to expect good-natured, non-creepy, shiny, happy people in the middle of NYC - particularly if you are a hot girl, spread eagle in shorts.
If my sister or girlfriend was doing that in the middle of Times Square, I would not go and engage in violent discourse with some random photographer filming her butt. That would be stupid, emotional and illegal.
BoberFett
Lifer
- Oct 9, 1999
- 37,562
- 9
- 81
I say nice things about people all the time. Just not to people like you and eits who appear to have no redeeming qualities.
eits
Lifer
LOL
honestly? you honestly think i have no redeeming qualities? why? have i purposely done something to hurt you or someone you know? do i constantly go around trolling people (for example, trolling someone based on an uninformed assumption in a thread completely unrelated to the assumption made of said someone)?
countless times, i've gotten pm's from people asking me about certain issues they are having and ask if they should see a chiropractor. sometimes i say yes, sometimes i say no. and if i do say yes, i take the time out of my busy fucking day to research the chiropractors in their area so that i know that they are in good hands. for those who i tell that chiropractic care wouldn't be necessary for their complaint, i give them recommendations for things to do at home or i tell them to see a different kind of professional or therapist.
not one redeeming quality? really? i fucking spend my day helping people to the best of my ability, whether that means treating them in my office or telling someone, "i'm sorry, but you don't need my services and it would be wrong of me to take you as a patient... i have the name and number of a guy you should see, though," i do the best i can for people because i generally care about people.
last week, i had a new patient who had a torn labrum in his hip. he asked his orthopedist's office to fax me the mri report three times in a week. they never did it. i drove 25 minutes out of my way to their office, told them who i was and demanded the mri report that the patient had requested they fax to my office. could the patient have done this? yes. however, he was on his feet all day long working and his hip was killing him and i wasn't going to treat him without knowing the exact stability of that joint. so, to save this guy any more pain and a headache, i did it for him and didn't charge him. i guess those are the actions of a self-serving low-life with now redeeming qualities whatsoever. the poor guy had to suffer a week before i would treat and rehab his hip because i wanted to make sure his knee was stable enough before i went charging him for services.
fuck you for questioning my integrity.
0roo0roo
No Lifer
- Sep 21, 2002
- 64,795
- 84
- 91
eits
Lifer
OverVolt
Lifer
- Aug 31, 2002
- 14,278
- 89
- 91
preslove
Lifer
- Sep 10, 2003
- 16,754
- 64
- 91
I love how all Mosh and eits stubbornly refuse to even address it.
You don't do something like this in Times Square and not get video taped & photographed by random people.
What's even funnier still is that you did exactly that earlier in this thread. Also that has nothing to do with what he posted, since he does in fact know that. We all know you're a chiropractor because you made sure to put it in your sig (and as if that weren't enough, you've gone out of your way to remind us by making a thread about it every so often).
As for questioning your integrity, we do that because you've proven how irrational you are about a wide variety of topics, and your willingness to ignore facts and make your own conclusions and assumptions that aren't supported (and often outright proven wrong) by the things you cite as proof.
As for the good you do, you could do that in a legitimate medical profession (which you've gone out of your way to trash on multiple occasions). Its funny that you criticize him for ignoring the good you do, when you've consistently done that about other professions (you've trashed doctors, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations, food industries, and who knows what else while ignoring the variety of good things they have done).
eits
Lifer
there's a difference between video taping someone in time square and trying to video record a peek at some underage girl's crotch when her shorts make an unintentional opening.
eits
Lifer
1, uh... you suck at making inferences. where did i make an assumption about a person? i said that based on the person's logic, it'd be ok to rape a girl who wore slutty clothes because she was asking for it. that's not an assumption nor is it a question of a person's character. it's a statement about the logic used in a person's post. he implied that she was asking for it because she wore shorts that, in his opinion, were too revealing.
2, lol bullshit. i make a claim and you and others argue with me about it. sometimes, i end up being right. sometimes, i'm wrong. when i'm wrong, i admit that i'm wrong. you honestly don't have a single clue about which you're talking about. "a whole variety of topics"? like what? because all i can think of was the chicken pox vaccine thing, the hfcs thing, and that's it. i won the hfcs debate, you won the chicken pox vaccine debate. what's your deal? i ignore "facts"... not facts. for example, your "facts" about hfcs, versus facts, biochemically, about how high fructose levels affect the body. i ignored your facts about the chicken pox vaccine and held onto my "facts"... in the search for the correct answer, i discovered i was wrong and i conceded that in the thread. somehow you think that shows me as being someone who ignores facts? go fuck yourself. you still refuse to accept hfcs is worse for you than sucrose and you still refuse to accept that the chicken pox vaccine increases rates of shingles among adults and that the mortality and morbidity rates of shingles are way higher than the mortality and morbidity rates of chicken pox. at least when i'm wrong, i've got the sac to admit it.
3, i haven't trashed any medical professionals. i've trashed big pharma. there's a big difference. i work with medical doctors constantly when co-managing certain patients. why the hell would i trash talk a necessary profession that helps save lives? i think you've got some bullshit preconceived notion of who i am and you're twisting what i say to fit whatever narrative you have going on in your head.
for the record, i have:
- not trash-talked medical doctors
- trash talked the pharmaceutical industry
- trash talked ONE particular vaccine, not vaccinations. i'm pro-vaccination. just not pro-chicken pox vaccination.
you say i trash talked "the food industry"? which one? wtf are you talking about? are you talking about hfcs? well, yeah... of course i trash talked hfcs. that doesn't mean i'm against food.
i accept the good things various industries do for the public. i don't ignore them. what i DO do, however, is highlight the bad things that certain industries do. why? because of the magnitude of the negative affect of the bad things they do. for example, it's basically like me saying rod blagojavic should be called out on being corrupt and you're saying "but look at all the good things he's done for illinois!"
0roo0roo
No Lifer
- Sep 21, 2002
- 64,795
- 84
- 91
oogabooga
Diamond Member
- Jan 14, 2003
- 7,807
- 3
- 81
holy hell people....just give it up already.
Regardless of where one sits on this issue, it seems like we're all dumber as a result of this thread.
We could get dumber?
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter