Perhaps the most important bit of science on race

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Was his name Abel and was he the only survivor of an interstellar ship wreck carrying a massive biomechanical terraforming interstellar weapons platform capable of genetic progenation?

:awe:

Somewhere there is a woman named Miang pulling strings behind the political curtains to cause a nuclear showdown between the west and middle east to end our current Zeboim Era to cleanse the contaminated gene pool which has grown unfit for Deus.
 
Last edited:

Whiskey16

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2011
1,338
5
76
In that show however, they claimed native Americans had DNA showing they were hybrid Northern Euro and Asian.
No, there is no such genetic evidence of European relations nor of any east-west migration route from Europe to North America.

All that has ever been presented are papers by a tiny minority of anthropologists for indirect assumptions of relationship between some tool work similiarities. Very weak stuff.

As it stands -- only multiple migrations from west-east.
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,767
435
126
Ugh, why do people like rabid instantly devolve threads like these into racism?

Its culture which is more relevant.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Ugh, why do people like rabid instantly devolve threads like these into racism?

Its culture which is more relevant.

Thread title: "Perhaps the most important bit of science on race." OP also mentions racial divides, etc. Nothing on culture though.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Thread title: "Perhaps the most important bit of science on race." OP also mentions racial divides, etc. Nothing on culture though.

Yes, because this science is very useful for helping people overcome the divides of race - feeling like other groups are some sort of aliens, increasing fear and hate a lot by recognizing that everyone is a lot closer from one race than people often recognize, separated not that long ago - but the genetics say nothing about cultural divides.

Unfortunately, that's another issue to deal with, to get people to 'appreciate diversity' and 'love their fellow man' and such rather than 'hate the other cultures'.

If the genetics do say anything about culture it might be that suspicion and a desire to kill 'competing cultures' helped groups survive in the past.

In which case genetics could be contributing to war and conflict.
 
Last edited:

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
The weird thing is that even though we know how long the human populations have been separated from one another, there are still people who say there's no such thing as race. For most of the time homo sapiens has existed, we have been separated into regional populations, which themselves are separated by ethnicity, then by tribes, and villages... Which is why you can tell peoples' races, ethnicities, and regional origins by their appearance. How you want to define race is just a matter of granularity.
 
Last edited: