• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

People that use IE...are just....

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: LAUST
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Correlation is not causation. Remember that IE captures not only the market of techies who know what they are doing and want to be running IE, but also the market of people who can barely turn on the computer. Since the other browsers require more knowledge to acquire them, they weed out the basic users from their user base. If Firebird or Mozilla or whatever were included in the basic build of machines then you'd see a lot more idiot users of those browsers.

ZV
Bingo. The only dumb person in this thread is Nuclear, as usual.
I 3rd that and 2nd the other 😉


4th
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Firebird is my primary browser, but there are many sites that simply refuse to function without IE.

I don't keep note of all of them, I simply launch IE. Basically if a site doesn't work properly in Firebird, I can launch IE and it'll work properly. These sites are definitely in the minority, and the annoyance isn't enough to make me use IE as my primary browser.

 
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Correlation is not causation. Remember that IE captures not only the market of techies who know what they are doing and want to be running IE, but also the market of people who can barely turn on the computer. Since the other browsers require more knowledge to acquire them, they weed out the basic users from their user base. If Firebird or Mozilla or whatever were included in the basic build of machines then you'd see a lot more idiot users of those browsers.

ZV
Bingo. The only dumb person in this thread is Nuclear, as usual.
I never said anything to dispute Zenmervolt's post, genius.
 
I like Opera because I can switch active windows by just pressing right mouse button and scrolling, I can move back/forward/refresh/close/create windows by pressing the right button and moving the rat left/right/up/down. It can block all popups in case I want, and it can search on Google on an instant. Plus, it has much more features.
 
Originally posted by: Vaerilis
I like Opera because I can switch active windows by just pressing right mouse button and scrolling, I can move back/forward/refresh/close/create windows by pressing the right button and moving the rat left/right/up/down. It can block all popups in case I want, and it can search on Google on an instant. Plus, it has much more features.

this is not necessarily directed at you vaerilis,

but why is it when there is a FEATURE built into windows (like windows backup for eg.) the "Intelligent Techies" scream about how much better the 3rd party utility is, but when opera has a feature built in for which there are many good 3rd party utilities, it's a good thing?

 
Both work fine for me. One nice thing about Mozilla perhaps is that the forum's "Quick Reply" box works in it but doesn't (at least not for me) in IE.
 
IE is old and lame. Even the crappiest alternative browser does it all better. Microsoft totally dropped the ball on the browser wars.
 
Guys, don't knock on Firebird until you try it. I kept using IE just until yesterday and I must say Firebird is much better. I'm sticking with this one for sure. 😉 Thanks.
 
Originally posted by: dwell
IE is old and lame. Even the crappiest alternative browser does it all better. Microsoft totally dropped the ball on the browser wars.

weird, they dropped the ball on the browsers war by WINNING??


They didn't JUST win because it was part of the OS, they won because IE was basically on par with it's competition and it was convenient. was it TOTALLY BETTER? No, was it competitive AND had the advantage of being packaged with the OS, YES, hence it won.

they didn't DROP the ball.
 
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: dwell
IE is old and lame. Even the crappiest alternative browser does it all better. Microsoft totally dropped the ball on the browser wars.

weird, they dropped the ball on the browsers war by WINNING??


They didn't JUST win because it was part of the OS, they won because IE was basically on par with it's competition and it was convenient. was it TOTALLY BETTER? No, was it competitive AND had the advantage of being packaged with the OS, YES, hence it won.

they didn't DROP the ball.
Yes they did. They sat on their laurels and watched the competition get better and better while doing nothing about it. IE may have won the browser wars but now Microsoft are just sitting on their asses watching everyone surpass them with features and eventually speed. They dropped the ball.

 
Back
Top