GunsMadeAmericaFree
Golden Member
I was starting to think about upgrading to a new motherboard/cpu. Here's what I was comparing:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116262
This is a Pentium D dual core 3.2 GHz retail for $95
or
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103773
This one is an Athlon 64 6000+ x2 3.0 GHz retail for $233
Why the disparity in prices? I was looking for a dual core CPU rated at 3 GHz or higher. Normally I stick with AMD because it tends to be 40% cheaper. That certainly isn't the case here!
I thought I would be waiting a year or more until a 3 GHz dual core AMD processor dropped under $100. However, now that I see a Pentium D rated over 3 GHz is already in that price range, I'm wondering how AMD can stay in business charging almost 2.5 times as much for what looks like a similar CPU.
Can anyone enlighten me please? Thanks!
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116262
This is a Pentium D dual core 3.2 GHz retail for $95
or
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103773
This one is an Athlon 64 6000+ x2 3.0 GHz retail for $233
Why the disparity in prices? I was looking for a dual core CPU rated at 3 GHz or higher. Normally I stick with AMD because it tends to be 40% cheaper. That certainly isn't the case here!
I thought I would be waiting a year or more until a 3 GHz dual core AMD processor dropped under $100. However, now that I see a Pentium D rated over 3 GHz is already in that price range, I'm wondering how AMD can stay in business charging almost 2.5 times as much for what looks like a similar CPU.
Can anyone enlighten me please? Thanks!