• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pentium 4 Prescott at 4+ ghz for mainstream use

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The Prescott isn't going to be using much more then 10-20 more watts at idle when compared to an low end conroe. Given the OP's modest needs I don't get all the calls to buy an $20-30 processor to save on $4-6 on power.
 
If it's fast enough, I suppose using a P4 is fine, especially in Ontario in winter 🙂 but once summer hits, probably need to upgrade/replace.

If upgrading will save him from pulling his hair out stuck at 100% CPU usage or having a fan sound like a vacuum cleaner, it might be worth the upgrade.
 
I have an old Dell microATX tower with a 3.8GHz Prescott. Made sure to replace the stock PSU with an EarthWatts 380W and it's been ticking along just fine.

Only use it as a RDP/VNC controlled machine on campus.
 
Prescott running at 4.0 GHz (or even reasonably higher) isn't really that unusual. I overclocked my grandmother's Cedar Mill Celeron D 3.46 to 4.33 GHz with absolutely no issue. Minor voltage bump was necessary. Cedar Mill is a direct die shrink of Prescott, as well.
 
Dont go to the p4, you will not be happy. I went from a pentium d to my sb celeron which is equal to a e7300 and i can not imagine going back to the pentium d. Buy a cheap core 2 duo and use that not the p4
 
windows 7 on that is a mistake. XP or nothing IMHO. 7 Needs a solid dual core. The core 2 duo is 2x as fast clock for clock as the Pentium 4 so yours would be like a single core 2ghz core2 chip. Which isn't bad, but isn't exactly that great for Windows7.
 
windows 7 on that is a mistake. XP or nothing IMHO. 7 Needs a solid dual core.

Nopes. Single core is perfectly fine doing what he wants. I even used a P3 1.13ghz laptop with 512mb ram and it handled Win7 fine. It would email and browse. I've ran Athlon Xp's, P4's, and they work great on Windows 7. I have an Asus eeepc 900mhz Celeron that I put Win7 on to play with and it ran just fine.

He has nothing to worry about when running his P4 on Win7 doing the stuff he wants to do.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top