• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pentium 200 Cruncher

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Assimilator1
Their are no PII 250's😉

asb002
Woah thats gotta take a good 40+hrs/SETI WU hasn't it? ,still it'all counts🙂

sure there are... P2 overclocked to 83MHz bus.. i had both my old P2 200's running @ 250.
 
Hehe ,nope Intel never made PII200's ,you had Pentiums or Pentium MMXs ,not PII 😉
Slowest PII was the 233 ,& overclocked doesn't count as a cpu speed made by Intel anway😛
 
Originally posted by: asb002
I've got an old Pentium 200 running Gentoo (now THAT was fun compiling), and I was wondering if Folding@Home is too much for it. Its been running almost 2 days straight and its still at 1%. Should this be? Top shows that its using ~97% of the CPU. If F@H is too much, I guess I'll go back to making it SETI cruncher.

On another note, would the same hold true for a Pentium 266 Laptop?

How about Lifemapper?

You'd probably get a workunit turned around in 5 hours or so.

George

 
I had a P1 233 OC to 300MHz on a Abit TX-5 mobo. All P1's that I've dealt with were not multiplier locked. My parents still use it today after 5+ years.
 
Yeah but many Pentium MMXs were multiplier limited ,in other words you could set a lower multiplier than standard but not higher ,my old Pentium 166MMX wouldn't go to a higher multiplier but would go lower,same with my Pentium 200MMX.

I had a Pentium 233MMX@266MHz crunching for me until last year!🙂
 
Back
Top