ElFenix Elite Member Super Moderator Mar 20, 2000 102,407 8,595 126 Sep 22, 2008 #1 k-m/k2000 lightweight kit lenses for k2000 (plastic mount rather than metal) nikon isn't the only company announcing a new fast standard lens ultra wide limited and TC hey, pentax, make a k-ltd!
k-m/k2000 lightweight kit lenses for k2000 (plastic mount rather than metal) nikon isn't the only company announcing a new fast standard lens ultra wide limited and TC hey, pentax, make a k-ltd!
F Flipped Gazelle Diamond Member Sep 5, 2004 6,666 3 81 Sep 23, 2008 #2 Yay Pentax! /looks around, sees he's alone, scurries away
M magomago Lifer Sep 28, 2002 10,973 14 76 Sep 23, 2008 #3 its tiny.... (the k-m) http://forums.dpreview.com/for...m=1036&thread=29435757 Check it out. i would like to see a comparison between it and u4/3. I'm sure the latter is smaller, but i'm curious by how much I'm interested in that TC for sure...thinking about picking up a 55-300, and if i toss on that TC I can push just over 600mm =) now let us see if they will announce a successor to the K20D...probably not :x glad to see a 55mm weather sealed, as well as 15mm wide angle
its tiny.... (the k-m) http://forums.dpreview.com/for...m=1036&thread=29435757 Check it out. i would like to see a comparison between it and u4/3. I'm sure the latter is smaller, but i'm curious by how much I'm interested in that TC for sure...thinking about picking up a 55-300, and if i toss on that TC I can push just over 600mm =) now let us see if they will announce a successor to the K20D...probably not :x glad to see a 55mm weather sealed, as well as 15mm wide angle
K kalster Diamond Member Jul 23, 2002 7,355 6 81 Sep 24, 2008 #4 that 60-250/4 looks very tempting weather sealed, constant f4, and sdm i wonder if its any lighter than the sigma 100-300/4
that 60-250/4 looks very tempting weather sealed, constant f4, and sdm i wonder if its any lighter than the sigma 100-300/4
H Heidfirst Platinum Member May 18, 2005 2,015 0 0 Sep 24, 2008 #5 it ought to be as if I understand correctly it's designed for APS-C design rather than full frame (which the Sigma is) so less glass needed etc.
it ought to be as if I understand correctly it's designed for APS-C design rather than full frame (which the Sigma is) so less glass needed etc.