Pentagon dept says US has lost the hearts and minds war

drewshin

Golden Member
Dec 14, 1999
1,464
0
0
http://www.sundayherald.com/46389

Will the higher ups like Rumsfeld listen? Or will this be pushed aside?

?The war has increased mistrust of America in Europe,? the report adds, ?weakened support for the war on terrorism and undermined US credibility worldwide.? This, in turn, poses an increased threat to US national security.

?Thus when American public diplomacy talks about bringing democracy to Islamic societies, this is seen as no more than self-serving hypo crisy. Moreover, saying that ?freedom is the future of the Middle East? is seen as patronising ? in the eyes of Muslims, the American occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq has not led to democracy there, but only more chaos and suffering. US actions appear in contrast to be motivated by ulterior motives, and deliberately controlled in order to best serve American national interests at the expense of truly Muslim self-determination.?

Rather than supporting tyranny, most Muslim want to overthrow tyrannical regimes like Saudi Arabia. ?The US finds itself in the strategically awkward ? and potentially dangerous ? situation of being the long-standing prop and alliance partner of these authoritarian regimes. Without the US, these regimes could not survive,? the report says.

?Americans are convinced that the US is a benevolent ?superpower? that elevates values emphasising freedom ? deep down we assume that everyone should naturally support our policies. Yet the world of Islam ? by overwhelming majorities at this time ? sees things differently. Muslims see American policies as inimical to their values, American rhetoric about freedom and democracy as hypocritical and American actions as deeply threatening.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
I think they should have realized that as soon as they termed part of the campaign "Shock and Awe" :(
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
It's not about spreading democracy.

The importance of the need to quickly establish a propaganda advantage is underscored by a document attached to the Pentagon report from Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary, dated May.

It says: ?Our military expeditions to Afghanistan and Iraq are unlikely to be the last such excursion in the global war on terrorism.?

What a suprise.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
I've read that the internet, specifically AQ's usage of it, has played a major role in our loss of this war.
 

tallest1

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2001
3,474
0
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
I've read that the internet, specifically AQ's usage of it, has played a major role in our loss of this war.

Link or at least a synopsis of what you read please?
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
This thread is actually a repost of this one Info.


Here's a link to the actual report Strategic Comms.. It's interesting reading for anyone who is intellectually curious enough to actually read it vice forming an opinion based on excerpts and headlines.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: tallest1
Originally posted by: Gaard
I've read that the internet, specifically AQ's usage of it, has played a major role in our loss of this war.

Link or at least a synopsis of what you read please?

link
WASHINGTON -- The United States will ultimately lose the war on terror because of its policies in the Middle East and because of concerns over the human rights of militants worldwide, the former head of the CIA's team that hunted Osama bin Laden said Friday.

In a conversation with United Press International's reporters and editors, Michael Scheuer, newly revealed as the author of the bestselling book "Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terror," said bin Laden was now possibly the Arab world's most popular leader, adding al-Qaida's domination of the Internet in the Muslim world was leading to the United States losing its battle for the hearts and minds of Muslims worldwide.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: tallest1
Originally posted by: Gaard
I've read that the internet, specifically AQ's usage of it, has played a major role in our loss of this war.

Link or at least a synopsis of what you read please?

link
WASHINGTON -- The United States will ultimately lose the war on terror because of its policies in the Middle East and because of concerns over the human rights of militants worldwide, the former head of the CIA's team that hunted Osama bin Laden said Friday.

In a conversation with United Press International's reporters and editors, Michael Scheuer, newly revealed as the author of the bestselling book "Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terror," said bin Laden was now possibly the Arab world's most popular leader, adding al-Qaida's domination of the Internet in the Muslim world was leading to the United States losing its battle for the hearts and minds of Muslims worldwide.

The CIA wants to TAKE AWAY YOUR INTERNET....
http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=449

December 02, 2004
This Blog is a ?Non-State Actor?
It was only a matter of time.

?Former CIA Director George J. Tenet yesterday called for new security measures to guard against attacks on the United States that use the Internet,? Shaun Waterman reports for United Press International. ?I know that these actions will be controversial in this age when we still think the Internet is a free and open society with no control or accountability,? Tenet told an information-technology security conference in Washington, ?but ultimately the Wild West must give way to governance and control.?

The former CIA director said telecommunications?and specifically the Internet?are a back door through which terrorists and other enemies of the United States could attack the country, even though great strides have been made in securing the physical infrastructure.

The Internet ?represents a potential Achilles? heel for our financial stability and physical security if the networks we are creating are not protected,? Mr. Tenet said.

He said known adversaries, including ?intelligence services, military organizations and non-state actors,? are researching information attacks against the United States.

Access to networks like the World Wide Web might need to be limited to those who can show they take security seriously, he said.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
We're losing because of Bush's stupid method of fighting it. He's an absolute failure as a strategist. Instead of doggedly pursuing al Q in Afghanistan and where ever else they might be, we attacked Iraq because they supposedly possessed huge stocks of WMD...which never turned up *gasp*
Now we're bogged down in a quagmire that cannot be won.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: arsbanned
We're losing because of Bush's stupid method of fighting it. He's an absolute failure as a strategist. Instead of doggedly pursuing al Q in Afghanistan and where ever else they might be, we attacked Iraq because they supposedly possessed huge stocks of WMD...which never turned up *gasp*
Now we're bogged down in a quagmire that cannot be won.

BINGO!!!

 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
The administration is gonna downplay it, and CAD is going to come here telling us how things are going so well in Iraq.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: SuperTool
The administration is gonna downplay it, and CAD is going to come here telling us how things are going so well in Iraq.

Just a flesh wound.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
More winning hearts and minds.

US military arrests Iraqi in charge of Sistani electoral list: aide

AFP: 12/5/2004

NAJAF, Iraq, Dec 5 (AFP) - The man in charge of drawing up an electoral list backed by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the spiritual leader of Iraq's Shiite Muslim majority, has been arrested by the US military, an aide said Sunday.

"American forces on Saturday arrested Mohammed Hashem al-Yehya, coordinator of the six-person committee set up by the Marjaiya (Iraq's highest Shiite authority) to supervise the drawing up of an electoral list with the backing of the ayatollah," said a Sistani representative in the holy city of Najaf.

"If he is not released, there will be serious consequences," said the source, giving no reason for Yehya's arrest in Baghdad.

The US military said it had heard reports of the arrest but was unable to give any further information.

On Tuesday, Shiite political leaders said that they were in the final stages of drawing up an electoral list that had Sistani's blessing, ahead of the landmark elections scheduled for January 30.

Sistani is one of the most powerful and popular figures in Iraq and commentators argue that any list endorsed by him would stand a good chance in the polls.

12/05/2004 17:39 GMT - AFP

 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
Well at least the world knows we aren't a bunch of pu$$Ies..and in the end isn't that all that really matters.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
People like bin Laden, Richard Clark, Noam Chomsky, and leftist across the globe contradict themselves daily.

For decades, these people complained that the US upheld the strongmen of the world, especially in the Middle East. They accuse the United States of being culpable for all the atrocities committed by these monsters. But when we take out one of these monsters, we're "losing the hearts and minds" of the Arab streets, the globe, or whatever. They see the invasion of Iraq as an injustice acted upon by a mad cowboy intent on stealing Saddam's oil. Conveniently, these people gloss over the fact that the madman they begged the US government to stop doing business with 20 years ago hasn't changed one bit. They selectively forget that he's broken over 20 laws of their most fabled institution, the United Nations.

bin Laden wouldn't have been happy until Islamo-terrorists took over Iraq

Richard Clark wouldn't be happy until Hussein's signature was on one of the authorization letters calling for terrorism against American interests in the Gulf

Noam Chomsky and the leftests wouldn't be happy until a liberal President, acting under the command of the liberal United Nations, decided to take out Hussein for humaniterian reasons.

Well, President Bush did it. It seems like everyone wanted Hussein's regime to go except the aforementioned people didn't figure it'd go like this. Either way, the end result would've been the same.

Screw the hearts and mind of the rest of the world. This was something that was long overdue but no one had the balls to do it. And no one wanted it to be done by someone who's interests was different than theirs. Those same hearts and mind will always come around.
 
Nov 3, 2004
10,491
22
81
Wel... after being pissed at Bush for all this sh1t for the last year to the point of murderous feelings, I've kinda accepted that there's no way I can do anything to make Bush smarter (I'm sure his dad tried all sorts of things)
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Wel... after being pissed at Bush for all this sh1t for the last year to the point of murderous feelings, I've kinda accepted that there's no way I can do anything to make Bush smarter (I'm sure his dad tried all sorts of things)

Well, one of the biggest mistakes you can ever make is underestimating your enemy/competitor. Those that have fallen into the trap of thinking/believing Bush is stupid are littered along his road to being Commander-in-Chief.

The more you think he's stupid, the less time you think about defeating him. I've met him and he's not stupid.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Wel... after being pissed at Bush for all this sh1t for the last year to the point of murderous feelings, I've kinda accepted that there's no way I can do anything to make Bush smarter (I'm sure his dad tried all sorts of things)

It is just too bad the Alcoholism or Cocaine didn't kill him before he killed our soldiers... :(
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Wel... after being pissed at Bush for all this sh1t for the last year to the point of murderous feelings, I've kinda accepted that there's no way I can do anything to make Bush smarter (I'm sure his dad tried all sorts of things)

Well, one of the biggest mistakes you can ever make is underestimating your enemy/competitor. Those that have fallen into the trap of thinking/believing Bush is stupid are littered along his road to being Commander-in-Chief.

The more you think he's stupid, the less time you think about defeating him. I've met him and he's not stupid.

I don't underestimate Bush or his cohorts. I have known for a long time he is a dangerous man. Bush isn't stupid so much as incompetent which is not the same. Normally that would not matter, but he is ruthless and has a great deal of power. He is not stupid though.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Wel... after being pissed at Bush for all this sh1t for the last year to the point of murderous feelings, I've kinda accepted that there's no way I can do anything to make Bush smarter (I'm sure his dad tried all sorts of things)

It is just too bad the Alcoholism or Cocaine didn't kill him before he killed our soldiers... :(

This is just a placeholder in case she decides to edit her post and I have time to respond.

 

phillyTIM

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2001
1,942
10
81
This is a fitting retribution to the Bush Regime's testosterone-induced, daddy-pleasing, reign of turmoil.

The US should be isolated and excluded from the World community, and left to disintegrate.

If US citizens can re-elect a bastard-child like the Bush Regime, it deserves what it gets.