Pedophiles in the White House? Pictures? Jeff Gannon former child victim of republican pedophiles?

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
Interesting analysis of what may be going on in Gannon/Guckert/Gosch's mind here:

Jeff Gannon, Johnny Gosch, Hunter Thompson, and Bohemian Grove snuff porn
http://www.total411.info/2005/02/jeff-gannon-johnny-gosch-hunter.html

And one more proof he is the little boy kidnapped many years ago to become a sex slave.

How widespread is this view that Gannon is that kidnapped boy?

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
Interesting analysis of what may be going on in Gannon/Guckert/Gosch's mind here:

Jeff Gannon, Johnny Gosch, Hunter Thompson, and Bohemian Grove snuff porn
http://www.total411.info/2005/02/jeff-gannon-johnny-gosch-hunter.html

And one more proof he is the little boy kidnapped many years ago to become a sex slave.

How widespread is this view that Gannon is that kidnapped boy?

There are still plenty of doubts. But, Noreen Gosch is feeding the rumor mill with her lack of full details and then a silence.

 

[Zebo]

Fact: 27 MORE examples of big-shot republican perverts, from mainstream newspapers:

Serial killer/rapist Ted Bundy campaigned for the Republican Party

Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.

Republican activist Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.

Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.

Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.

Republican Congressman Donald "Buz" Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a minor and sentenced to one month in jail.

Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges.

Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex crimes involving children.

Republican activist Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child.

Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a minor working as a congressional page.

Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.

Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.

Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. "Republican Marty"), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with a juvenile and one count of delivering the drug LSD.

Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks, an advisor to a California assemblyman, was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.

Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.

Republican preacher Stephen White was arrested after allegedly offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.

Republican talk show host Jon Matthews of Houston was indicted for indecency with a child, including exposing his genitals to a girl under the age of 17.

Republican anti-gay activist Earl "Butch" Kimmerling confessed to molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.

Republican Party leader Paul Ingram of Thurston County, Washington, pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.

Republican St. Louis Election Board official Kevin Coan was arrested and charged with trying to buy sex from a 14-year-old girl whom he met on the Internet.

Republican politician Andrew Buhr, former committeeman for Hadley Township Missouri, was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.

Republican politician Keith Westmoreland, a Tennessee state representative, was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to minors under 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).

Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was charged with sexual misconduct involving a 15 year old girl.

Republican legislator, Richard Gardner, a Nevada state representative, admitted to molesting his two daughters.

Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.

Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found in his possession.

Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin Vanderwall was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.

Fact: By comparing the contents of computers, anyone can see that most republicans are obsessed with pedophillia, rape, torture, and an endless variety of illegal, unconcentual and frightening sexuality. Liberals on the other hand, have legal, mainstream porn.

You don?t need to take my word on it - INVESTIGATE FOR YOURSELF!

1. Go to http://www.k-lite.tk and download ?Kazaa Lite?. There are other file-sharing programs like this, but I?ve never used them so I can?t give instructions for them.

2. This is very important: don?t download anything, because odds are, it?s probably stolen. If you do decide to download something, get as many anti-virus programs as you can. Your computer is about to engage in some wild orgies so put as many rubbers on him that he gets it on like the Michilin Tire Man. There are free demos you can get, which are 100% legal. For example, I did a search for ?Avg anti-virus? and got a good demo.

3. Start by searching for something conservative. I searched for ?Rush Limbaugh? and ?Gods and Generals?.

4. Now that you?ve found something conservative, right-click on the file and select ?Search for more from same?? and drag to ?User?. Now you can see what files that user has on his computer. This is not hacking, this is a 100% legal way to spy on people, and, dare I saw, even read their minds.

5. You might want to confirm that you?re dealing with a republican. Some clues are lots of country music, ?Southern Rock? (normal rock isn?t white enough for them), professional wrestling, tractor pull clips, etc, they?ve all got them. There?s another type of file they all have, which I?m getting too.

6. Notice the column headers. Click ?Size? and you can set either the biggest or smallest files at the top of the list. Video files are the biggest, other than software. Also, click ?category? and the list will segregate, scroll up and down until you find ?erotica?.

7. Just by reading the titles and descriptions you can get an idea of what they like. By holding your pointer over a file, a description will pop up after a while. If the description is unclear or uses words that you don?t understand, DON?T download them. Some code-words, by the way ?nudist? usually means they went to a nude beach and pointed a hidden camera at kids, ?golden shower? has nothing to do with trickle down economics (no wait - it has EVERYTHING to do with Bush economics, never mind), ?child love? has nothing whatsoever to do with love, ?up skirt? ain?t Monroe dancing in an updraft, it?s usually non-consensual. ?Bitch? is, of course, the same thing Rush Limbaugh called a 13 year-old Chelsea Clinton.

8. Once your keyboard is obscured due to buildup of vomit, it?s time to do the scientific thing and see what liberals have on their computers. (Get a cup of coffee now, this part is boring). You?ll notice liberals have a fetish for consensual, of age porn, if they need porn at all, and out of the corner of my eye I may or may not have witnessed soft-core.

9. Repeat this experiment until satisfied. Note: users with only a few files, or only audio files (who think they?re using napster) don?t count towards the final score, of course.

So far I?ve done 3 experiments, while chatting on IRC. Each link brings up the chat log, with chatter on other topics removed.

Experiment #1:

Score:

Republicans:

1 pedophile into beastiality, torture and mutilation

1 pedophile into incest

1 pedophile into rape, bondage

1 into "girlscouts fisting" ?

1 into incest and ?fat Mexican bitch?

1 into hymens and tenticles

1 lots of porn, nothing but anal

1 "cat fight" ?

1 beatings and toilets

Democrats:

1 no porn

2 legal porn

Unknown: 1 no porn

Experiment #2:

Republicans: 1 into pissing into women?s mouths

Democrats: 2 no porn, 1 ?busty? of age porn

Unknown:

1 Aruban with Rush Limbaugh and no porn

5 Europeans with no porn

Experiment #3

Democrats = 4 law abiding citizens

One with 1 of-age porn file + Madonna's Justify my love

One with of-age women in bikinis

One with 2 porn files and many cartoon images

One no porn at all

Republicans = 2 violent pedophiles, 2 terrorist sympathizers,

One IRA sympathizer with no porn, One "WTC incredible suicide jump" no porn, one pedophile + rape + bondage, One pedophile into beatings and "clit-piercing"

Check out this page it's not suprising in the least the way they revel in Iraq/gitmo torture, never saw a punitive measure they did'nt like and general world view.

http://www.geocities.com/arthursank/sexualmorality.html

 

[Votingisanillusion]

The investigation proceeds:
http://www.total411.info/2005/04/dr-hunter-s-thompson-and-franklin.html

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
The investigation proceeds:
http://www.total411.info/2005/04/dr-hunter-s-thompson-and-franklin.html

I thought this was interesting:


Gannon-is-Gosch mystery makes new MSNBC show

A new talk show on MSNBC, "Dietl and Daniels" featured as it's first story, the mystery of whether faux journalist Jeff Gannon is actually kidnapped Iowa paperboy Johnny Gosch. Bo Dietl did most of the interview and had on Johnny's mother Noreen Gosch and investigators Andy Stephenson and James Rothstein. (I want to thank my source for alerting me to this segment and this new show on MSNBC, otherwise I would've missed it).

Basically they went over the case and showed photos of Gosch at age 12 in 1982 and Gannon in present day. There are striking similarities and supposedly the two share similar birthmarks.
Of course Dietl asked Noreen Gosch if when she was briefly reunited with her son in 1997, if this guy Gannon looked like the same man claiming to be her son back then. She blandly answered that she wasn't sure. I was disappointed Mrs. Gosch didn't say more about what she thought about the whole issue.

Dietl said he talked to 'Gannon' (aka James Guckert) last night and had an in-depth conversation with him about various issues. Dietl said he asked Gannon point blank if he was Johnny Gosch and all Gannon said was "I feel sorry for that poor woman, Noreen." Dietl added that his gut told him Gannon wanted to talk more but that his lawyers told him not to. So, basically, Gannon left the door open. Dietl said that his show would stay on the story and await new developments. Mr. Rothstein ended the show saying they sent an investigator to talk to Gannon and that when the issue of "Johnny Gosch" came up, Gannon slammed the door in his face.

 

[PatboyX]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
The investigation proceeds:
http://www.total411.info/2005/04/dr-hunter-s-thompson-and-franklin.html

I thought this was interesting:


Gannon-is-Gosch mystery makes new MSNBC show

A new talk show on MSNBC, "Dietl and Daniels" featured as it's first story, the mystery of whether faux journalist Jeff Gannon is actually kidnapped Iowa paperboy Johnny Gosch. Bo Dietl did most of the interview and had on Johnny's mother Noreen Gosch and investigators Andy Stephenson and James Rothstein. (I want to thank my source for alerting me to this segment and this new show on MSNBC, otherwise I would've missed it).

Basically they went over the case and showed photos of Gosch at age 12 in 1982 and Gannon in present day. There are striking similarities and supposedly the two share similar birthmarks.
Of course Dietl asked Noreen Gosch if when she was briefly reunited with her son in 1997, if this guy Gannon looked like the same man claiming to be her son back then. She blandly answered that she wasn't sure. I was disappointed Mrs. Gosch didn't say more about what she thought about the whole issue.

Dietl said he talked to 'Gannon' (aka James Guckert) last night and had an in-depth conversation with him about various issues. Dietl said he asked Gannon point blank if he was Johnny Gosch and all Gannon said was "I feel sorry for that poor woman, Noreen." Dietl added that his gut told him Gannon wanted to talk more but that his lawyers told him not to. So, basically, Gannon left the door open. Dietl said that his show would stay on the story and await new developments. Mr. Rothstein ended the show saying they sent an investigator to talk to Gannon and that when the issue of "Johnny Gosch" came up, Gannon slammed the door in his face.

it is interesting...but i dont think it really matters.
id feel bad hounding someone about that. does it really appear to make a big difference?

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: PatboyX

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
The investigation proceeds:
http://www.total411.info/2005/04/dr-hunter-s-thompson-and-franklin.html

I thought this was interesting:


Gannon-is-Gosch mystery makes new MSNBC show

A new talk show on MSNBC, "Dietl and Daniels" featured as it's first story, the mystery of whether faux journalist Jeff Gannon is actually kidnapped Iowa paperboy Johnny Gosch. Bo Dietl did most of the interview and had on Johnny's mother Noreen Gosch and investigators Andy Stephenson and James Rothstein. (I want to thank my source for alerting me to this segment and this new show on MSNBC, otherwise I would've missed it).

Basically they went over the case and showed photos of Gosch at age 12 in 1982 and Gannon in present day. There are striking similarities and supposedly the two share similar birthmarks.
Of course Dietl asked Noreen Gosch if when she was briefly reunited with her son in 1997, if this guy Gannon looked like the same man claiming to be her son back then. She blandly answered that she wasn't sure. I was disappointed Mrs. Gosch didn't say more about what she thought about the whole issue.

Dietl said he talked to 'Gannon' (aka James Guckert) last night and had an in-depth conversation with him about various issues. Dietl said he asked Gannon point blank if he was Johnny Gosch and all Gannon said was "I feel sorry for that poor woman, Noreen." Dietl added that his gut told him Gannon wanted to talk more but that his lawyers told him not to. So, basically, Gannon left the door open. Dietl said that his show would stay on the story and await new developments. Mr. Rothstein ended the show saying they sent an investigator to talk to Gannon and that when the issue of "Johnny Gosch" came up, Gannon slammed the door in his face.

it is interesting...but i dont think it really matters.
id feel bad hounding someone about that. does it really appear to make a big difference?

No, it makes no difference. It would be incredibly sad if he really is that abducted kid.

 

[conjur]

Conspiracy of Silence (video)
http://www.thelawparty.org/Franklincoverup.htm

Satanism, Child Abuse & Republican Fundraising
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a396facc72f4d.htm

Sex, Lies, Videotape, Teenagers, Drugs, Blackmail, and Death
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a388cd49f5ce8.htm

 

[Last Rezort]

Originally posted by: LtPage1
no one will care. bush has sold himself as being a moral born-again so well, that it would take something way more personal than this to do any harm to the white house while hes in it.

I agree. The only way anyone will care enough to really effect a change in office would be for bush to eat a newborn baby on national T.V.

I mean if it?s ok to attack a country without congressional approval, lie and falsify ?facts? given to the public. If its ok for our Vice pres to still be paid by a company given a large no bid contract by his administration. Would people care about anything less.

There are still Americans that equate Iraq with the 9/11 attack.

Ignorance is bliss and knowledge largely ignored.

 

[Votingisanillusion]

Seems some people are trying to shut down senator DeCamp:
http://sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2383

"Franklin Cover Up" author John DeCamp to sue Barbara Hartwell for Libel



International Politics [SiaNews EXCLUSIVE: Barbara Hartwell, on various sites, has stated for the record that attorney John DeCamp, author of The Franklin Cover Up--which exposed a high-level homosexual/pedophile ring in Nebraska that led straight to the George Bush White House--is, himself, involved in pedophilia. DeCamp has issued the following written statement]:

by John DeCamp
25 April 2005

To: Tim White

I appreciate the e-mails you have provided me relative to the apparent allegations Ms. Hartwell is making against me, John DeCamp, personally. I DENY ABSOLUTELY & UNEQUIVOCALLY THE LIBELOUS & SLANDEROUS ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THIS WOMAN AGAINST & ABOUT ME. Further, any issues or claims she would like to make have been tested in the courts & my vindication has been documented in some detail in my book, every single edition THE FRANKLIN COVER UP ever put out, & Ms. Hartwell should know this.

Ms. Hartwell claims she got her information & documentation & proof directly from the HOLY SPIRIT, as I understand it.

I NEED your help, Mr. White, in getting Hartwell's exact address so I can enter my suit in the proper court & properly notify her of my intentions & properly serve her with legal papers.

I do not personally use the internet, believe it or not--have to rely on my office help & my kids (who live on the damned internet) & hence I am sending this formal letter to you, Mr. White, so that you can help me locate the exact address of this creature, Hartwell, to properly & totally & legally & effectively sue her for libel.

So, Tim, would appreciate your reply ASAP & you are welcome to forward this information to creature Hartwell. First thing I will do in my libel suit against her is to take Hartwell's Deposition & deposition of INFO PROVIDER, who is, according to her, THE HOLY SPIRIT. So, she better be ready to produce her witness--the Holy Spirit--or suffer the consequences...

I AM DEAD SERIOUS ABOUT THIS, TIM. Feel free to provide this information to [retired FBI Special Agent-in-Charge, Los Angeles Division--Ted] Gunderson or any one you deem appropriate. I do not know why Hartwell is making her libelous claims against me, what her goals & intentions are, OR WHO IS BEHIND HER DOING THIS & FOR WHAT REASONS, but I must sue her for it.

I do know this: I have never put one thing on the Internet myself during all this controversy & information sharing on the Gannon matter or the who, why, where & how of where all the information is coming from. Clearly, someone is trying to shut me up in advance, I suspect.

As for the woman's claims I defended Kissinger. BULLSHIT. Kissinger was the single most involved & important individual in the firing improperly of my best friend, C.I.A. Head Bill Colby. He fired Colby improperly &, in my opinion, because Colby was revealing before the Congress (Church Committee Hearings) secrets of government wrong doing Kissinger did not want exposed.

I DID, I am sure, follow my absolute standard policy in the radio program of NOT SUPPORTING OR DEFENDING ANY ALLEGATIONS ABOUT ANYONE THAT I DID NOT PERSONALLY HAVE THE PROOF FOR. And, with respect to Mr. Kissinger, I am sure--without in any way remembering the program Hartwell claims I was on--that when "allegations" of sexual impropriety were made about Kissinger that I would have pointed out that:

"I do not know. I do not have proof of Mr. Kissinger sexual impropriety that is alleged & that you are asking me about."

THAT DOES NOT MEAN I AM DEFENDING KISSINGER. It means I am protecting myself against libel. Why so careful?

My book, The Franklin Cover Up, resulted in a dozen of the most powerful attorneys in America threatening me with Libel at a press conference because in my book I name the names of the Most Powerful folk in America--BUT I ALWAYS GIVE PROOF or HAVE THE PROOF READY TO GIVE IF QUESTIONED.

I replied to libel suit threats with my statement that Truth is a Defense & I am ready to defend any libel suits filed against me.

THERE WAS NOT & HAS NOT BEEN ONE SINGLE LIBEL SUIT FILED AGAINST ME OR MY BOOK. I DARED THEM ALL TO FILE.

I however, filed MY OWN PERSONAL LIBEL suit against the Great Atlantic Telecast Co., out of Wilmington, North Carolina for claiming on their news broadcast that my claims about many powerful & prominent individuals I named, were a lie. I won that suit & got a big cash settlement (as part of the agreement I am not allowed to disclose the amount) & a public apology on their National TV station two nights in a row on the evening news. Based on what I have seen from Ms. Hartwell, it is my intent absolutely to file same type libel lawsuit against her.

With respect to Hartwell's claims about "Linda Wiegand" & my supposedly "cheating her or her friend" out of money in work I did for her. AGAIN, BULLSHIT. Her friends filed Bar complaint against me which was investigated from here to hell freezes over. Despite fact State Bar hated me with a passion & would have done anything to get me. (Because of book, Franklin Cover Up which named some bar members in the book.)

THE STATE BAR TOTALLY, UNCONDITIONALLY CLEARED ME ON THESE CLAIMS.

Respectfully,

John W. DeCamp