• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

PCMark 2002 scores

aeternitas2

Junior Member
6441
5427
750


I'm a bit confused about the 750 score. I used to get around 800 on my older WD400 now im getting mid 700s on a WD1200JB...? Perhaps the testing on the older one was done on the outter edge of the dist as my new drive is being tested on the inner? On a RAID0 of the WD400 and a Maxtor D740X-6L i was getting near 1200. NF 3.13 and ATA 133 enabled.

Anyone have any tips?
 
well i got like 600 with WD Raptors in RAID 0 lol!!!

nothing wrong with them, 130mb/s read and 90mb/s write
 
That's what I don't like about benchmarks, why having a higher fps should do anything to your hardrive score is unknown to me. But my system is the same:

1.8ghz at 333mhz score was
4889
4604
697

at 2300mhz at 200fsb
7058
5743
1092

and try a defrag before the test.
 
Damn.. I miss my old 1200+ HD scores. I really do think PC Mark tests wherever the drive has free-space. Kind of lame. Nice scores. 😀

6666
5582
 
PCMark scores are pretty worthless. But here are some for comparison anyway 😀 Stock XP2500's are soooooo slow. Even at stock speeds a 2400 is faster in EVERYTHING I used them for.

XP2500 (210x11) + nForce2
CPU: 7078 Mem: 6267 HDD: 1004

XP2500 (stock) + nForce2
CPU: 5672 Mem: 5229 HDD: 1017

XP2400 (166x12.5) + kt333
CPU: 6195 Mem: 3970 HDD: 650

XP2400 (stock) + kt333
CPU: 5783 Mem: 4335 HDD: 529

XP2200 (stock) + kt333
CPU: 5115 Mem: 3259 HDD: 784
 
P4 2.4C@3.5GHZ (292FSB) 3:2 CAS 2,7,3,3

CPU = 8789
MEM = 10377
HDD = 1351

I have a WD raptor as well, but I don't trust this program anyways...
 
Back
Top