• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

pci bus speed

33mhz 32bit
66mhz 64bit

I think you can have 66mhz 32bit slots too.

I think PCI-X is 66mhz-133mhz, but I'm not positive.
 
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
33mhz 32bit
66mhz 64bit

I think you can have 66mhz 32bit slots too.

I think PCI-X is 66mhz-133mhz, but I'm not positive.

66mhz 64 bits per second translates to MB/sec like this:

66,000 hz (means once per second) x 64 bits = 4224000

/ 8 (for bits to bytes) = 528000

/ 1024 (for B -> MB) = 515.625 MegaBytes / Second

128.9MB/sec
515.6MB/sec
respectively

You can find those and even more specs at the PCI specification website:
http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/pcix_20/

 
A normal 32bit/33MHz PCI slot like is on just about every desktop board made is 133MB/sec

Also PCI bus is shared so if you have anything else on the PCI bus (IDE, netowrk) it needs to share that 133MB/sec.

For SCSI cards it doesn't make sense to get more than a SCSI 160 board unless you have some Captain Insano hard drive setup. Even 15k drives top out in the 50-70 MB/sec range, so you'd need 2-3 transferring at the SAME TIME for SCSI 160 to be limiting things.

 
Originally posted by: Concillian
A normal 32bit/33MHz PCI slot like is on just about every desktop board made is 133MB/sec

Also PCI bus is shared so if you have anything else on the PCI bus (IDE, netowrk) it needs to share that 133MB/sec.

For SCSI cards it doesn't make sense to get more than a SCSI 160 board unless you have some Captain Insano hard drive setup. Even 15k drives top out in the 50-70 MB/sec range, so you'd need 2-3 transferring at the SAME TIME for SCSI 160 to be limiting things.

RAID 5 is completely scalable. It can easily reach speeds of 3GB/sec with enough drives.
 
Originally posted by: V00D00
Originally posted by: Concillian
A normal 32bit/33MHz PCI slot like is on just about every desktop board made is 133MB/sec

Also PCI bus is shared so if you have anything else on the PCI bus (IDE, netowrk) it needs to share that 133MB/sec.

For SCSI cards it doesn't make sense to get more than a SCSI 160 board unless you have some Captain Insano hard drive setup. Even 15k drives top out in the 50-70 MB/sec range, so you'd need 2-3 transferring at the SAME TIME for SCSI 160 to be limiting things.

RAID 5 is completely scalable. It can easily reach speeds of 3GB/sec with enough drives.


Don't forget about two RAID 5 arrays in a RAID 0 array. (Raid 50) That breaks it. 😉
 
Originally posted by: V00D00
Originally posted by: Concillian
it doesn't make sense to get more than a SCSI 160 board unless you have some Captain Insano hard drive setup.

RAID 5 is completely scalable. It can easily reach speeds of 3GB/sec with enough drives.

While I don't think I'd use the word 'easily', I don't disagree and never said anything to the contrary of that. I thought I had covered situations like that because I do believe that would be a 'Captain Insano hard drive setup'. Especially for an end user.
 
Back
Top