[pcgameshardware.de]Star Wars Battlefront 2 Beta Benchmarks

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kondziowy

Senior member
Feb 19, 2016
212
188
116
RX480, R9 Nano and Fury X disagree with you, as they gain performance in 1440p.
 

crisium

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2001
2,643
615
136
Looking at the computerbase benchmarks, it appears that this game follows TFLOPs pretty linearly - much more than other games. Bandwidth and the number of ROPs don't seem to matter. 570 > 390 by a bit despite half the ROPs, less bandwidth. 1070 Ti barely behind a 1080, and miles ahead of the 1070.
 

Flapdrol1337

Golden Member
May 21, 2014
1,677
93
91
Yeah, 1070Ti being identical to a 1080 is surprising.

Too bad the game is a pay2win piece of garbage.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,313
3,177
146
Too bad they launched it this way so far. Well, it made me buy the classic swbf2 on steam for $10 :D
 

Despoiler

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2007
1,968
773
136
The game runs great on my Fury with everything cranked. DX11. DX12 is a nightmare. Stalls all over the place. The game is mind blowing gorgeous. The textile texture on the uniforms is insane. I've never seen better looking cloth materials. Faces are super detailed. The crafting of the levels and world is very meticulous.

The game itself is good IMO. The pay2win is largely over blown. Most people are so terrible that level 4 cards can't even help them. The campaign is 4 hours long. Some of the worst writing I've ever had to endure. The story was a lot of "well isn't that convenient to move the story along." The gameplay was decent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gikaseixas

itsmydamnation

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2011
3,113
3,960
136
Yeah, the engine must be super bandwidth efficient.
We are heading down the path larrabee tried to push a decade ago. It was the obvious path but we just didn't have the transistor budget then. Its hard to scale "core" counts and keep linear performance, it makes sense to increase functionality and flexibility of those cores and reduce the fixed pipeline paths that while very fast at what they do create inefficiencies in the pipeline.